TBU Publications
Repository of TBU Publications

Tacit Knowledge Sharing and Organizational Culture Model of Competitive Values Framework: A Theoretical Research

DSpace Repository

Show simple item record


dc.title Tacit Knowledge Sharing and Organizational Culture Model of Competitive Values Framework: A Theoretical Research en
dc.contributor.author Ershova, Maria
dc.relation.ispartof Proceedings of the 9th International Conference Liberec Economic Forum 2009
dc.identifier.isbn 978-80-7372-523-5
dc.date.issued 2009
dc.citation.spage 83
dc.citation.epage 93
dc.event.title 9th International Conference Liberec Economic Forum
dc.event.location Liberec
utb.event.state-en Czech Republic
utb.event.state-cs Česká republika
dc.event.sdate 2009-09-15
dc.event.edate 2009-09-16
dc.type conferenceObject
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher Technická univerzita v Liberci, Ekonomická fakulta cs
dc.relation.uri http://vyzkum.hf.tul.cz/wd/download/2009/Sbornik-2009_engl-LEF.pdf#page=83
dc.subject knowledge management en
dc.subject tacit knowledge sharing en
dc.subject organizational culture en
dc.subject competitive values framework en
dc.description.abstract Tacit knowledge sharing is considered to be the factor which allows to facilitate decision-making and to increase competitive ability and effectiveness of organization. Even if coded knowledge is easier to diffuse, the role of tacit knowledge is often essential for being able to use coded knowledge. Coded knowledge can even be unusable without the augmentation of tacit knowledge. The role of organizational culture is highly relevant for tacit knowledge sharing, which is social activity, face-to-face interaction and therefore can be influenced only through culture. This paper represents a theoretical research about how the types of organizational culture according to the Competitive Values Framework model are supportive for tacit knowledge sharing. The Competing Values Framework consists of four culture types: clan, adhocracy, market and hierarchy. Clan culture is found to support tacit knowledge sharing all, factors described refer to clan culture values and description. Adhocracy culture is the second culture type most supporting tacit knowledge sharing. Market and hierarchy hardly do so, and organizations willing to increase tacit knowledge sharing will have to increase the presence in their culture of clan and adhocracy types. These findings provide with insights, which put us closer to better understanding what factors to use to change organization in the direction of "high" tacit knowledge sharing. The article does not claim the final truthfulness of these conclusions, but more calls for further practical research to validate or disclaim them as well as provide with the extent of validity of these conclusions, which the author will carry out. This paper is made within grant-maintained project of GA CR (Czech Science Foundation): Reg. No. 406/08/0459, "Developing Managerial Tacit Knowledge". en
utb.faculty Faculty of Management and Economics
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10563/1001843
utb.identifier.obdid 43865783
utb.identifier.wok 000272657000009
utb.source d-wok
dc.date.accessioned 2011-08-09T07:34:04Z
dc.date.available 2011-08-09T07:34:04Z
utb.contributor.internalauthor Ershova, Maria
utb.fulltext.affiliation Maria Ershova Tomas Bata University in Zlin, Faculty of Management and Economics Mostní 5139, 760 01 Zlín, Czech Republic email: marijulka@hotmail.com
utb.fulltext.dates -
utb.fulltext.references [1] CAMERON, K. S., QUINN, R. E. Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture: Based on the Competing Values Framework. – Revised edition. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, 1999. ISBN 0‐7879‐8283‐0. [2] LEONARD D., SENSIPER, S. The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Group Innovation. California Management Review, 1998, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 112‐132. ISSN 0008‐1256. [3] HALDIN‐HERRGARD, T. Difficulties in diffusion of tacit knowledge in organizations. The Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2000, Vol. 1 No. 4. ISSN 1469‐1930. [4] LAWSON C., LORENZI, E. Collective Learning, Tacit Knowledge and Regional Innovative Capacity. Regional Studies, 1999, vol. 33 no. 4, pp. 305‐317. ISSN 0043‐325X. [5] BROWN, J. S., DUGUID, P. Organizing Knowledge. California Management Review, 1998, vol. 40 no. 3 pp. 90‐111. ISSN 0008‐1256. [6] BROCKMANN, E. N., ANTHONY, W. P. The Influence of Tacit Knowledge and Collective Mind on Strategic Planning. Journal of Managerial Issues, 1998, vol. X, no. 2, pp. 204‐222. ISSN 1045‐3695. [7] SHARIQ, S. Z. How does knowledge transform as it is transferred? Speculations on the possibility of a cognitive theory of knowledgescapes. Journal of Knowledge Management, 1999, vol. 3 no. 4. ISSN 1743‐8276. [8] HARRISON, R., STOKES, H. Diagnosing Organizational Culture. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer&Company, 1992. ISBN 0883903164. [9] JUNG, C. Psychological Types. Collected Works of C. G. Jung, Volume 6. Princeton, N. J. Princeton University Press. ISBN 0‐691‐09774. [10] MYERS, I. B., MYERS, P. B. Gifts Differing: Understanding Personality Type. Mountain View, CA: Davies‐Black Publishing,  1980, 1995. ISBN 0‐89106‐074‐X. [11] MCKENNEY, J., KEEN, P. How Managers' Minds Work. Harvard Business Review, May‐June 1974, pp. 79‐90. ISSN 00178012. [12] MASON, R., MITROFF, I. I. A Program of Research in Management. Management Science, 1973,19, 475‐487. ISSN: 1526‐5501. [13] MITROFF, I., KILMANN, R. Stories Managers Tell: A New Tool for Organizational Problem Solving. Management Review, 1975, 64, 18‐28. ISSN 1740‐4754. [14] HALDIN‐HERRGARD, T. Mapping Tacit Knowledge with Epitomes. Systèmes d'Information et Management, 2003, Vol. 8, Nr. 2. ISSN 1934‐8703. [15] O'DELL, C., GRAYSON, J. If only we knew what we know: the transfer of internal knowledge and best practice. New York: Free Press, 1998. ISBN 0684844745. [16] ALONY, I., WHYMARK, G., JONES, M. Sharing Tacit Knowledge: A Case Study in the Australian Film Industry. Informing Science Journal, 2007, Vol. 10, p41‐59, 19p. ISSN 15214672. [17] REAGANS, R.,  MCEVILY, B. Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2003, 48(2), 240‐268. ISSN 0001‐8392. [18]  SZULANSKI, G. Unpacking stickiness: an empirical investigation of the barriers to transfer best practice inside the firm. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1995, p. 437‐441. ISSN 0896‐7911. [19] HANSEN, M. The search‐transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1999. 44(1), 82‐111. ISSN 0001‐8392. [20] CROSS, R., CUMMINGS, J. Tie and network correlates of individual performance in knowledge intensive work. Academy of Management Journal, 2004. 47, 928. ISSN 0001‐4273. [21] HANSEN, M. Knowledge networks: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in  multiunit companies. Organization Science, 2002. 13(3), 232. ISSN 1526‐5455. [22] ARDICHVILI, A., PAGE, V., WENTLING, T. Motivation and barriers to participation  in virtual knowledge‐sharing communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge  Management, 2003. 7(1), 64 ‐ 77. ISSN 1743‐8276. [23] LEVIN, D., CROSS, R. The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of  trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 2004. 50(11), 1477‐1490. ISSN: 1526‐5501.
utb.fulltext.sponsorship This paper is made within grant‐maintained project of GA ČR (Czech Science Foundation): Reg. No. 406/08/0459, “Developing Managerial Tacit Knowledge”.
Find Full text

Files in this item

Show simple item record