TBU Publications
Repository of TBU Publications

Review and comparison of conceptual frameworks on digital business transformation

DSpace Repository

Show simple item record

dc.title Review and comparison of conceptual frameworks on digital business transformation en
dc.contributor.author Nwaiwu, Fortune
dc.relation.ispartof Journal of Competitiveness
dc.identifier.issn 1804-171X Scopus Sources, Sherpa/RoMEO, JCR
dc.identifier.issn 1804-1728 Scopus Sources, Sherpa/RoMEO, JCR
dc.date.issued 2018
utb.relation.volume 10
utb.relation.issue 3
dc.citation.spage 86
dc.citation.epage 100
dc.type article
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher Univerzita Tomáše Bati ve Zlíně (UTB), Fakulta managementu a ekonomiky
dc.identifier.doi 10.7441/joc.2018.03.06
dc.relation.uri https://www.cjournal.cz/index.php?hid=clanek&bid=aktualni&cid=297&cp=
dc.relation.uri https://www.cjournal.cz/files/297.pdf
dc.subject digitisation en
dc.subject digitalisation en
dc.subject digital technologies en
dc.subject digital business transformation en
dc.subject conceptual frameworks en
dc.subject theoretical frameworks en
dc.description.abstract This paper applies an academic approach in assessing various conceptual and theoretical frameworks considered relevant to the subject of digital business transformation and that contribute to increasing the general understanding of the subject. A review and comparison of several conceptual and theoretical frameworks that were identified to be relevant to the subject of digital business transformation was conducted with the aim of assessing their suitability and robustness in addressing the subject, which is gaining prominence as a pathway for achieving and maintaining competitiveness for businesses as digital technologies continue to shape and transform the business landscape. The background information required for the comparison of the frameworks was obtained after a comprehensive review of each of the frameworks, and based on the insights obtained following the review, their relevance and applicability to the subject of digital business transformation was determined. A qualitative approach was adopted in conducting desk research using reputable business and scientific data sources. The output of the literature search was narrowed down by applying elimination parameters that ensured only relevant articles and journals were included in the final comparison of literatures that contained relevant conceptual and theoretical frameworks. The research established that there is a lack of alignment between industry-based research and academic-based research on the subject of digital business transformation. The research findings and agenda of the study have important implications for organisational transformation as it relates to digital technologies and their transformative effects on industry segments and organisational structures through digitalisation. en
utb.faculty Faculty of Management and Economics
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10563/1008244
utb.identifier.obdid 43878327
utb.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85066115517
utb.identifier.wok 000445967900007
utb.source j-orig
dc.date.accessioned 2018-10-18T10:31:47Z
dc.date.available 2018-10-18T10:31:47Z
dc.description.sponsorship [IGA/FaME/2018/005]
dc.rights Attribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.rights.access openAccess
utb.contributor.internalauthor Nwaiwu, Fortune
utb.fulltext.affiliation Fortune Nwaiwu Contact information Ing. Fortune Nwaiwu Tomas Bata University in Zlín Faculty of Management and Economics Department of Industrial Engineering Czech Republic E-mail: nwaiwu@utb.cz ORCID: 0000-0001-8900-2130
utb.fulltext.dates -
utb.fulltext.references 1. Baptista, G., & Oliveira, T. (2015). Understanding mobile banking: The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology combined with cultural moderators. Computers in Human Behaviour, vol 50, pp: 418–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.024 2. Berman, S., Korsten, P., & Marshall, A. (2016). Digital Reinvention in Action: What to Do and How to Make It Happen. IBM, 2016. Retrieved from http://public.dhe.ibm.com/common/ssi/ecm/gb/en/gbe03752usen/gbe03752-usen-08_GBE03752USEN.pdf 3. Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O.A., Pavlou, P.A., & Venkatraman, N. Digital business strategy: toward a next generation of insights. MIS Quarterly, 37 (2), 471–482. 4. Bowersox, D. J., Closs, D. J., & Drayer, R. W. (2005). The Digital Transformation: Technology and beyond. Supply Chain Management Review, 9 (1), 22–29. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/221201326?accountid=15518 5. Bradley, J., Loucks, J., Macaulay, J., Noronha, A., & Wade, M. (2015). Digital Vortex: How Digital Disruption Is Redefining Industries. Cisco. Retrieved from https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/solutions/collateral/industry-solutions/digital-vortex-report.pdf. 6. Buřita L., Hrušecká D., Pivnička M., & Rosman P. (2018). The use of knowledge management systems and event-B modelling in a lean enterpise. Journal of Competitiveness, 10 (1), 40–53. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2018.01.03 7. Corver, Q., & Elkhuizen, G. (2014). A Framework for Digital Business Transformation. Cognizant, 1–10. Retrieved from https://www.cognizant.com/InsightsWhitepapers/a-framework-for-digital-business-transformation-codex-1048.pdf 8. Chromjaková F. (2016). The Key Principles of Process Manager Motivation in Production and Administration Processes in an Industrial Enterprise. Journal of Competitiveness, 8 (1), 95–110 https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2016.01.07 9. Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13 (3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 10. Kavadias, S., Ladas, K., & Loch, C. (2016). The transformative business model. Harvard Business Review, 1. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1827622937?accountid=15518 11. Matt, C., Hess, T., & Benlian, A. (2015). Digital Transformation Strategies. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 57 (5). 339–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-015-0401-5 12. Negahban, A., & Chung, C. H. (2014). Discovering determinants of users perception of mobile device functionality fit. Computers in Human Behaviour. 35 (1), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2014.02.020 13. Nylén, D. & Holmström, J. (2015). Digital innovation strategy: A framework for diagnosing and improving digital product and service innovation. Business Horizons, 58 (1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2014.09.001 14. Schmarzo, B. (2016). Digital Business Transformation Framework, CIO from IDG. Retrieved from https://www.cio.com/article/3130103/analytics/digital-business-transformation-framework.html 15. Tuček D. (2015). The Main Reasons for Implementing BPM in Czech Companies. Journal of Competitiveness, 7 (3), 126–142 https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2015.03.09 16. Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions Subject Areas: Design Characteristics, Interventions, Management Support, Organizational Support, Peer Support, Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Technology Adoption, Training, User Acceptance, User Involvement, and User Participation. Decision Sciences, 39 (2). 17. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F.D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46 (2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc. 18. Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model. Information Systems Reserach, 11 (4), 342–365. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872 19. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27 (3). 425–478. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 20. Venkatesh, f. & Zhang X. (2010). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: US vs. China. Journal of Global Informantion Technology Management, 13 (1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198X.2010.10856507 21. Wade, M., Noronha, A., Macaulay, J., & Barbier, J. (2017). Orchestrating digital business transformation. Working in Concert to Achieve Digital Excellence. 22. Wade, M. (2015). Digital Business Transformation. 23. Westerman, G. (2017). Your Company Doesn’t Need a Digital Strategy. MITSloan Management Review. Retrieved from https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/your-company-doesnt-need-a-digital-strategy/. 24. Wokurka G., Banschbach Y., Houlder D., & Jolly R. (2017) Digital Culture: Why Strategy and Culture Should Eat Breakfast Together. In: Oswald G., Kleinemeier M. (eds) Shaping the Digital Enterprise. Springer, Cham 25. Yablonsky, S. (2018) A Multidimensional Framework for Digital Platform Innovation and Management: From Business to Technological Platforms. System Research and Behavioral Sciences, 35: 485–501. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2544
utb.fulltext.sponsorship This study was supported by funding provided by IGA/FaME/2018/005 – “Process management model proposal for implementation of Industry 4.0 in SMEs.”
utb.wos.affiliation [Nwaiwu, Fortune] Tomas Bata Univ Zlin, Fac Management & Econ, Dept Ind Engn, Zlin, Czech Republic
utb.scopus.affiliation Tomas Bata University in Zlín, Faculty of Management and Economics, Department of Industrial Engineering, Czech Republic
utb.fulltext.projects IGA/FaME/2018/005
utb.fulltext.faculty Faculty of Management and Economics
utb.fulltext.ou Department of Industrial Engineering
utb.identifier.jel O32
Find Full text

Files in this item

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International