TBU Publications
Repository of TBU Publications

Business environment quality index in the SME segment

DSpace Repository

Show simple item record


dc.title Business environment quality index in the SME segment en
dc.contributor.author Čepel, Martin
dc.contributor.author Stasiukynas, Andrius
dc.contributor.author Kotásková, Anna
dc.contributor.author Dvorský, Ján
dc.relation.ispartof Journal of Competitiveness
dc.identifier.issn 1804-171X Scopus Sources, Sherpa/RoMEO, JCR
dc.date.issued 2018
utb.relation.volume 10
utb.relation.issue 2
dc.citation.spage 21
dc.citation.epage 40
dc.type article
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher Univerzita Tomáše Bati ve Zlíně (UTB), Fakulta managementu a ekonomiky
dc.identifier.doi 10.7441/joc.2018.02.02
dc.relation.uri https://www.cjournal.cz/index.php?hid=clanek&bid=archiv&cid=283&cp=
dc.subject business environment en
dc.subject quality of business environment en
dc.subject quality index en
dc.description.abstract The aim of this paper was to define and quantify significant factors that shape the quality of the business environment in the SME segment and to create the business environment quality index. A part of this aim was a comparison of defined factors in the Czech Republic (CR) and the Slovak Republic (SR). In regards to the aim defined, a survey-based research was conducted with enterprises operating in the SME segment. 312 enterprises in CR and 329 enterprises in SR were approached during this research. To verify the defined scientific hypotheses, a custom Business Environment Quality Index was created that was quantified separately for CR and SR. The research results brought interesting findings. The aggregated Business Environment Quality Index in the Slovak Republic reached the value of 0.460, which was higher than that of the Czech Republic (0.418). Slovak entrepreneurs gave the economic factors a higher rating than Czech entrepreneurs. Similarly, Slovak entrepreneurs rated the importance of the Central Bank in establishing a stable business environment and the role of commercial banks in financing business needs more positively. The evaluation of political factors is relatively negative in both countries. Slovak entrepreneurs evaluated more positively the judicial system in the area of commercial law, the state's influence on the business environment, and the administrative burden on enterprises. Czech entrepreneurs had a minor issue with the state bureaucracy's impact on the business environment. The evaluation of technological factors is relatively negative in both countries, as the value of this index is slightly below 0.250. Slovak entrepreneurs better assessed the situation on the job market and the cooperation of the public sector with the business environment. On the contrary, Czech entrepreneurs gave the infrastructure level in the area of research and development a better rating. The evaluation of social factors is relatively positive in both countries. Entrepreneurs in the Slovak Republic perceive a more positive attitude of the society towards entrepreneurs and a more intense influence of the family on entrepreneurship, and positively evaluate media's activities in regards to the business environment. The evaluation of the competitive environment is more positive in Slovakia. When evaluating the narrower competitive environment, it was discovered that Slovak entrepreneurs think that customers, suppliers, and employees play a positive role in their business. en
utb.faculty Faculty of Management and Economics
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10563/1008116
utb.identifier.obdid 43879089
utb.identifier.wok 000437712800002
utb.source j-wok
dc.date.accessioned 2018-08-03T12:49:41Z
dc.date.available 2018-08-03T12:49:41Z
dc.rights Attribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.rights.access openAccess
utb.contributor.internalauthor Dvorský, Ján
utb.fulltext.affiliation Martin Cepel, Andrius Stasiukynas, Anna Kotaskova, Jan Dvorsky Contact information Dr. Martin Cepel, Ph.D., MBA Faculty of Economics and Business Paneuropean University in Bratislava Tematínska 10, 851 05 Bratislava, Slovak Republic E-mail: cepel@benzinol.com Andrius Stasiukynas Kazimieras Simonavicius University Dariaus ir Girėno g. 21, Vilnius 02189, Lithuania E-mail: andrius@snowarena.lt Ing. Anna Kotaskova Faculty of Economics and Business Paneuropean University in Bratislava Tematínska 10, 851 05 Bratislava, Slovak Republic E-mail: anna.kotaskova@gmail.com Ing. Jan Dvorsky, Ph.D. Tomas Bata University in Zlín Faculty of Management and Economics Mostní 5139, 760 01 Zlín, Czech Republic E-mail: jan.dvorsky5@gmail.com
utb.fulltext.dates -
utb.fulltext.references 1. Adamowicz, M., & Machla, A. (2016). Small and medium enterprises and the support policy of local government. Oeconomia Copernicana, 7(3), 405–437. https://doi.org/10.12775/OeC.2016.024. 2. Ahmedova, S. (2015). Factors for increasing competitiveness of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Bulgaria. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195 (1), 1104–1112. 3. Androniceanu, A. (2017). Hospital management based on the relationship between doctors and patients. Administratie si Management Public, (29), 41–53. 4. Armas-Cruz, Y, Gil-Soto, E., Oreja-Rodríguez, J. R. (2017) Environmental management in SMEs: organizational and sectoral determinants in the context of an Outermost European Region. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 18(5), 935–953, https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2017.1373375. 5. Artistovnik, A. & Obadic, A. (2015). The impact and efficiency of public administrative excellence on fostering SMEs in the EU countries. Amfiteatru Economic, 17(39), 761–774. 6. Banno, M., Piscitello, L., & Varum, C. (2014). The impact of public support on SMEs outward FDI: Evidence from Italy. Journal of Small Business Management, 52(1), 22–38. 7. Bekeris, R. (2012). The impact of macro-economic indicators upon SME’s profitability. Ekonomika, 91(3), 117–128. 8. Belanová, K. (2014). Komparácia kvality podnikateľského prostredia v krajinách Vyšehradskej štvorky s osobitným akcentom na dostupnosť finančných zdrojov. Biatec, 22(1): 12–17. 9. Belas, J., Kljucnikov, A., Vojtovic, S., & Sobekova-Májkova, M. (2015). Approach of the SME Entrepreneurs to Financial Risk Management in Relation to Gender and Level of Education. Economics and Sociolog y, 8 (4), 32–42. 10. Božić, L. & Rajh, E. (2016). The factors constraining innovation performance of SMEs in Croatia. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 29(1), 314–324, https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2016.1168040. 11. Bunoa, M., Nadanyiova, M., & Hraskova, D. (2015). The comparison of the quality of business environment in the countries of Visegrad group. Procedia Economics and Finance, 26 (1), 423–430. 12. Conorto, R. a kol. (2014). Analýza, monitor kvality podnikateľského prostredia v SR a konkurencie schopnosť ekonomiky. Bratislava: Centrum vzdelávania MPSVR SR. 13. Czarniewski, S. (2016). Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in the Context of Innovation and Entrepreneurship in the Economy. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 13(1), 30–39. 14. Dobeš, K., Kot, S., Kramoliš, J., & Sopková, G. (2017). The Perception of Governmental Support in the Context of Competitiveness of SMEs in the Czech Republic. Journal of Competitiveness, 9 (3), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2017.03.03. 15. Dragnic, D. (2014). Impact of internal and external factors on the performance of fast-growing small and medium businesses. Management: Journal of Contemporary Management Issues, 19(1), 119–159. 16. Draskovic, V., Popov, E., & Peleckis, K. (2017). Modelling of Institutional Changes in Transition Countries - the Gap Between the Theory and Practice. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 13(1), 125–140. 17. Gavurova, B., Vagasova, T., & Kovac, V. (2016). Competitiveness Assessment of Slovak Republic Regions. European Financial System. 2016. 13th International Scientific Conference of the European Financial Systems. Edited by:Krajicek, J; Nesleha, J; Urbanovsky, KBrno, 2016, 175–184. 18. Chládková, H. (2015). Selected approaches to the business environment evaluation. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 63(2), 513–523. http://dx.doi.org/10.11118/actaun201563020515. 19. Investiční web. (2016). Světový žebříček konkurenceschopnosti vede Švýcarsko, Česko je 31. Co nám chybí, a v čem jsme naopak (relativně) silní? Available from http://www.investicniweb.cz/news-2016-9-28-zebricek-konkurenceschopnosti-vede-svycarsko-cr-je-31/. 20. Ivanová, E. (2017). Barriers to the development of SMEs in the Slovak Republic. Oeconomia Copernicana, 8(2), 255–272. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.v8i2.16. 21. Kaur, D. & Srivastava, S. (2017). Corporate debt restructuring and firm performance: a study of Indian firms. Serbian Journal of Management, 12(2), 271–281. 22. Kitching, J., Hart, M & Wilson, N. (2015). Burden of benefit? Regulation as a dynamic influence on small business performance. International Small Business Journal, 33(2), 130–147. 23. Ključnikov, A. & Popesko, B. (2017). Export and Its Financing in the SME Segment. Case Study From Slovakia. Journal of Competitiveness, 9(1), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2017.01.02. 24. Kljucnikov, A., & Belas, J. (2016). Approaches of Czech entrepreneurs to debt financing and management of credit risk. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 11(2), 343–365. https://doi.org/10.12775/EQUIL.2016.016. 25. Kot, S. (2017). Funkcjonowanie małych i średnich przedsiębiorstw w kontekście zarządzania łańcuchem dostaw. Przegląd Organizacji, 11 (1), 3–11. 26. Kozubíková, L., Homolka, L., & Kristalas, D. (2017). The Effect of Business Environment and Entrepreneurs’ Gender on Perception of Financial Risk in the Sme Sector. Journal of Competitiveness, 9(1), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2017.01.03. 27. Körner, P., Kudrna, Z., & Vychodil, O. (2002). Měření kvality podnikatelského prostředí ve střední Evrope. Finance a úvěr, 52(12), 674–697. 28. Lakic, S. & Draskovic, M. (2015). Implications of Institutional Dispositions of Neoliberalism. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 11(2), 113–124. 29. Marinescu, C. (2013). Institutional Quality of the Business Environment: Some European Practices in a Comparative Analysis. Amfiteatru Economics, 15(33), 270–287. 30. Marinescu, C. & Jora, O, D. (2013). Assessment on the institutional economics of corruption. Business and development in Romania, between formal and informal practices. Amfiteatru Economic, 15(7), 603–616. 31. Ohanyan G. & Androniceanu, A. (2017). Evaluation of IMF program effects on employment in the EU. Acta Oeconomica, 67 (3), 311–332. 32. Petrenko, E., Iskakov, N., Metsyk, O., & Khassanova, T. (2017). Ecosystem of entrepreneurship: risks related to loss of trust in stability of economic environment in Kazakhstan. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 5(1), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2017.5.1(8). 33. Pietrzak, M. B., Balcerzak, A. P., Gajdos, A., & Arendt, L. (2017). Entrepreneurial environment at regional level: the case of Polish path towards sustainable socio-economic development. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 5(2), 190–203. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2017.5.2(2). 34. Podnikateľská Aliancia Slovenska (2017). Slovensko sa posunulo v globálnom rebríčku, pomohlo viac leteckých liniek, mobilov, rýchlejší internet a zhoršenie iných. Available from: http://alianciapas.sk/category/pravidelne_aktivity/sprava_o_globalnej_konkurencieschopnosti/. 35. Podnikateľská Aliancia Slovenska. (2015). Index vnímania korupcie 2014. Available from: http://alianciapas.sk/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/05-TI-koment-2015.pdf. 36. Podnikatel.cz. (2013). Většina podnikatelů tráví papírováním celé dny, byrokracie se prý navíc zvyšuje. Available from: http://www.podnikatel.cz/clanky/vetsina-podnikatelu-travi-papirovanim-nekolik-dni-byrokracie-se-navic-zvysuje/. 37. Sanusi, K. A., Meyer, D., & Ślusarczyk, B. (2017). The relationship between changes in inflation and financial development. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 16 (2), 253–265. 38. Sinicakova, M., & Gavurova, B. (2017). Single Monetary Policy versus Macroeconomic Fundamentals in Slovakia. Ekonomicky casopis, 65(2), 158–172. 39. Tonoyan, V., Strohmeyer, R., Habib, M. & Perlitz, M. (2010). Corruption and entrepreneurship: How formal and informal institutions shape small firm behaviour in transition and mature market economics. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 803–832. 40. Virglerova, Z., Homolka, L., Smrčka, L., Lazányi, K., & Klieštik, T. (2017). Key determinants of the quality of business environment of SMEs in the Czech Republic. E & M Ekonomie a Management, 20(2), 87–100. https://doi.org./10.15240/tul/001/2017-2-007. 41. Virglerova, Z., Dobes, K., & Vojtovic, S. (2016). The Perception of the State Influence on Its Business Environment in the SMEs from the Czech Republic. Administratie si Management Public, 14 (26), 78–96. 42. Vrchota, J. & Rehor, P. (2017). Influence of strategies to determine the significance of the crisis by the managers of small and medium-sized enterprises. Serbian Journal of Management, 12 (1), 53 – 63. 43. Wruuck, P. (2015). The business environment in the eurozone. Deutsche Bank AG Deutsche Bank Research Frankfurt am Main Germany. Available at: https://www.dbresearch.com/PROD/DBR_INTERNET_EN-PROD/ PROD 000000 00 00379559/The_business_environment_in_the_eurozone%3A_Why_it_i.pdf. 44. Social Science Statistics (2017). Z Score Calculator for 2 Population Proportions. Retrieved September 15, 2017 from: http://www.socscistatistics.com/tests/ztest/Default2.aspx. 45. Zizlavsky, O. (2016). Innovation performance measurement: research into Czech business practice. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 29(1), 816–838, https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2016.1235983.
utb.fulltext.sponsorship -
utb.wos.affiliation [Cepel, Martin; Kotaskova, Anna] Paneuropean Univ Bratislava, Fac Econ & Business, Tematinska 10, Bratislava 85105, Slovakia; [Stasiukynas, Andrius] Kazimieras Simonavicius Univ, Dariaus Ir Gireno G 21, LT-02189 Vilnius, Lithuania; [Dvorsky, Jan] Tomas Bata Univ Zlin, Fac Management & Econ, Mostni 5139, Zlin 76001, Czech Republic
utb.fulltext.projects -
Find Full text

Files in this item

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International