TBU Publications
Repository of TBU Publications

Innovation performance and R&D expenditures in Western European regions: Divergence or convergence?

DSpace Repository

Show simple item record

dc.title Innovation performance and R&D expenditures in Western European regions: Divergence or convergence? en
dc.contributor.author Bednář, Pavel
dc.contributor.author Halásková, Martina
dc.relation.ispartof Journal of International Studies
dc.identifier.issn 2071-8330 Scopus Sources, Sherpa/RoMEO, JCR
dc.date.issued 2018
utb.relation.volume 11
utb.relation.issue 1
dc.citation.spage 210
dc.citation.epage 224
dc.type article
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher Centre of Sociological Research
dc.identifier.doi 10.14254/2071-8330.2018/11-1/16
dc.relation.uri https://jois.eu/?411,en_innovation-performance-and-rd-expenditures-in-western-european-regions-divergence-or-convergence-
dc.subject European regions en
dc.subject Expenditures en
dc.subject Innovation en
dc.subject Performance en
dc.subject Research and development en
dc.subject Spatial econometrics en
dc.subject Western Europe en
dc.description.abstract Although Western Europe is a global leader in innovation activities among the OECD countries, these activities are not distributed evenly across NUTS 2 regions. Thus, the analysis of convergence or divergence related to innovation performance and R&D expenditures among Western European NUTS 2 regions is posed as the aim of this paper. Applying differential local version of spatial autocorrelation (LISA), difference-in-difference estimation the paper reveals the local variation of convergence and divergence and general spatial regime divergence in innovation performance and R&D expenditures within Western European NUTS 2 regions. Moreover, spatial lag cross-sectional regression provides support to the consideration of R&D expenditures as determinant for innovation performance along with the continuing divergence between most of Western and Southern European NUTS 2 regions and the others. Thus, the results confirm the stability in innovation performance and R&D expenditures in Western European NUTS 2 regions which could be the source of lagging behind not only other OECD countries but BRICS countries as well. On the regional level several NUTS 2 regions demonstrated the convergence dynamics, however, the general spatial divergence regime should lead to more actions regarding R&D polices under the EU programming period of 2014-2020. © Foundation of International Studies, 2018 and CSR, 2018. en
utb.faculty Faculty of Management and Economics
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10563/1007883
utb.identifier.obdid 43879629
utb.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85044839627
utb.source j-scopus
dc.date.accessioned 2018-04-23T15:01:49Z
dc.date.available 2018-04-23T15:01:49Z
dc.rights Attribution 3.0 Unported
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
dc.rights.access openAccess
utb.contributor.internalauthor Bednář, Pavel
utb.fulltext.affiliation Bednář, P., & Halásková, M. Pavel Bednář Department of Regional Development Public Administration and Law, Faculty of Management and Economics, Tomas Bata University in Zlín Czech Republic bednar@fame.utb.cz Martina Halásková Department of Public Economics, Faculty of Economics, VŠBTechnical University of Ostrava Czech Republic martina.halaskova@vsb.cz
utb.fulltext.dates Received: May, 2017 1st Revision: August, 2017 Accepted: November, 2017
utb.fulltext.references Anselin, L. (2016, May 7). GeoDa Workshop part 2 [PDF]. Chicago: Center for Spatial Data Science University of Chicago. Retrieved January 12, 2017, from https://s3.amazonaws.com/geoda/software/docs/Geoda_tour.pdf. Anselin, L., & Rey, S. J. (2014). Modern spatial econometrics in practice: a guide to GeoDa, GeoDaSpace and PySAL. Chicago, IL: GeoDa Press LLC. Aristovnik, A. (2014). Efficiency of the R&D sector in the EU-27 at the regional level: An application of DEA. Lex localis – Journal of Local Self-Government; 12(3), 519-531. doi: 10.4335/12.3.519-531(2014) Aristovnik, A. (2012). The relative efficiency of education and R&D expenditures in the new EU member states. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 13(5), 832-848. doi:10.3846/16111699.2011.620167 Autant-Bernard, C., Fadairo, M., & Massard, N. (2013). Knowledge diffusion and innovation policies within the European regions: Challenges based on recent empirical evidence. Research Policy, 42(1), 196-210. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.07.009 Borrás, S., & Edquist, C. (2013). The choice of innovation policy instruments. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(8), 1513-1522. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.03.002 Bottazzi, L., & Peri, G. (2003). Innovation and spillovers in regions: Evidence from European patent data. European Economic Review, 47(4), 687-710. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2921(02)00307-0 Bramanti, A., & Tarantola, S. (2012). Regional innovation index. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved February 15, 2017,from: http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC76795/lbna25594enn.pdf. Commission of the European Communities. (2006). Commission decision of 4th August 2006 drawing up the list of regions eligible for funding from the Structural Funds under the Convergence objective for the period 2007-2013 (notified under document number C (2006) 3475. Official Journal of the European Union, 49(L 243), 44-46. Conte, A., Scweizer, P., Dierx, A., & Ilzkovitz, F. (2009). An analysis of the efficiency of public spending and national policies in the Area of R&D. Occasional papers 54. Brussels: European Commission. Corea, P. (2014). Public expenditure reviews in science, technology, and innovation. Washington, DC: The World Bank. Dominicis, L. de, Florax, R. J., & De Groot, H. L. (2011). Regional clusters of innovative activity in Europe: Are social capital and geographical proximity the key determinants? Tinbergen Institute, (009), 3rd ser., 1-23. Retrieved January 12, 2017, from http://papers.tinbergen.nl/11009.pdf EC (2010). Europe 2020. European strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Retrieved January 17, 2017, from http://ec.europa.eu/eu2020/pdf/COMPLET%20EN%20BARROSO%20%20%20007%20-%20Europe%202020%20-%20EN%20version.pdf EC (2017). The EU framework programme for research and innovation. What is Horizon 2020? Retrieved January 17, 2017, from: http://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/what-horizon-2020. Eurostat (2016). Statistics database – Research and development. Retrieved January 22, 2017, from: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database. Feng, X.., Tan, X.., Alenzi, E. O., Rai, P., & Chang, J. (2016). Spatial and temporal variations of screening for breast and colorectal cancer in the United States, 2008 to 2012. Medicine, 95(51). doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000005656 Freeman, C. (1995). The national innovation systems in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 5-24. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035309 Halásková, M.., & Halásková, R. (2015a). Research and development expenditure assessment based on selected indicators in the EU countries. In Proceedings of the 7th International Scientific Conference Finance and the Performance of Firms in Science, Education, and Practice. Zlín: Tomas Bata University, pp. 342-357. Halásková, R.., & Halásková, M. (2015b). Current issues of research and development policy in EU countries. In Machová, Z., Tichá, M. (eds.). Proceedings of the 13th International Conference „Economic Policy in the European Union Member Countries “. Ostrava: VŠB – Technical University of Ostrava, pp. 161-174. Lau, C. K., Yang, F. S., Zhang, Z., & Leung, V. K. (2015). Determinants of innovative activities: Evidence from Europe and Central Asia region. The Singapore Economic Review, 60(01), 1-18. doi: 10.1142/s0217590815500046 Lelek, T. (2014). Trend analysis of human resources development representing the base for researchers in selected economies. Journal of Competitiveness, 6(1), 71-86. doi 10.7441/joc.2014.01.05 Martinez, F., & Potluka, O. (2015). Does the EU Funding Increase Competitiveness of Firms by Supporting Organisational Changes? Journal of Competitiveness, 7(2), 23-37. doi: 10.7441/joc.2015.02.02. Moreno, R.., Paci, R., & Usai, S. (2005). Spatial spillovers and innovation activity in European regions. Environment and Planning A, 37(10), 1793-1812. doi: 10.1068/a37341 Marrocu, E., Paci, R., & Usai, S. (2013). Proximity, networking and knowledge production in Europe: What lessons for innovation policy? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(8), 1484-1498. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.03.004 Meliciani, V., & Savona, M. (2014). The determinants of regional specialization in business services: agglomeration economies, vertical linkages and innovation. Journal of Economic Geography, 15(2), 387-416. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbt038 OECD (2015). Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for collecting and reporting data on Research and Experimental Development [online]. Retrieved January 12, 2017, from http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-AssetManagement/oecd/science-and-technology/frascati-manual-2015_9789264239012-en#page1. Oughton, C., Landabaso, M., & Morgan, K. (2002). The regional innovation paradox: innovation policy and industrial policy. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), 97-110. doi: 10.1023/A:1013104805703 Pazour, M. & Kučera, Z. (2009). Trends in formulation of innovation policy in selected European countries, ERGO, 4(2), 9-13. Prokop, V., & Stejskal, J. (2017). Different approaches to managing innovation activities: An analysis of strong, moderate, and Modest Innovators. Inzinerine Ekonomika – Engineering Economics, 28(1), 47-55. doi: 10.5755/j01.ee.28.1.16111 Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Crescenzi, R. (2008). Research and development, spillovers, innovation systems, and the genesis of regional growth in Europe. Regional Studies, 42(1), 51–67. doi: 10.1080/00343400701654186 Roman, M. (2010). Regional efficiency of knowledge economy in the new EU countries: The Romanian and Bulgarian case. MPRA Paper, 23083. Retrieved January 28, 2017, from https://mpra.ub.unimuenchen.de/23083/1/MPRA_paper_23083.pdf. Szarowska, I., & Žurkova, D. (2017). Public expenditure on research and development and its Relationship with Economic Growth in the Czechia, Denmark and Slovakia. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice – Series D, 24(39), 211-222. Šimková, N. (2015). The Hierarchical Clustering of Tax Burden in the EU27. Journal of Competitiveness, 7(3), 95-109. doi: 10.7441/joc.2015.03.07 Tkač, M., Spišaková, E. D., & Gontkovičová, B. (2017). Research and development in Slovakia, Denmark and Finland from the Perspective of the Strategy Europe 2020. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice – Series D, 24(39), 223-235. Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34(8), 1203-1219. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018 Varga, A., Pontikakis, D., & Chorafakis, G. (2012). Metropolitan Edison and cosmopolitan Pasteur? Agglomeration and interregional research network effects on European R&D productivity. Journal of Economic Geography, 14(2), 229-263. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbs041
utb.fulltext.sponsorship The authors are thankful to the Operational Programme Education for Competitiveness (Project No. CZ.1.07/2.3.00/20.0296) and Tomas Bata University in Zlín (Project No. VaV-IP-RO/2016/08).
utb.scopus.affiliation Department of Regional Development Public Administration and Law, Faculty of Management and Economics, Tomas Bata University in Zlín, Czech Republic; Department of Public Economics, Faculty of Economics, VŠB-Technical University of Ostrava, Czech Republic
utb.fulltext.projects CZ.1.07/2.3.00/20.0296
utb.fulltext.projects VaV-IP-RO/2016/08
Find Full text

Files in this item

Show simple item record

Attribution 3.0 Unported Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 3.0 Unported