Publikace UTB
Repozitář publikační činnosti UTB

Study of the differences in the perception of the use of the principles of corporate social responsibility in micro, small and medium-sized enterprises in the V4 countries

Repozitář DSpace/Manakin

Zobrazit minimální záznam


dc.title Study of the differences in the perception of the use of the principles of corporate social responsibility in micro, small and medium-sized enterprises in the V4 countries en
dc.contributor.author Gavurová, Beáta
dc.contributor.author Schönfeld, Jaroslav
dc.contributor.author Bilan, Yuriy
dc.contributor.author Dudáš, Tomáš
dc.relation.ispartof Journal of Competitiveness
dc.identifier.issn 1804-171X Scopus Sources, Sherpa/RoMEO, JCR
dc.identifier.issn 1804-1728 Scopus Sources, Sherpa/RoMEO, JCR
dc.date.issued 2022
utb.relation.volume 14
utb.relation.issue 2
dc.citation.spage 23
dc.citation.epage 40
dc.type article
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher Univerzita Tomáše Bati ve Zlíně (UTB), Fakulta managementu a ekonomiky
dc.identifier.doi 10.7441/joc.2022.02.02
dc.relation.uri https://www.cjournal.cz/index.php?hid=clanek&bid=archiv&cid=442&cp=
dc.subject socially responsible business en
dc.subject corporate social responsibility en
dc.subject competitive advantage en
dc.subject firm reputation en
dc.subject employee loyalty en
dc.description.abstract The aim of the study was to examine the differences in the perception of the use of selected principles by CSR managers and owners of Micro, Small and Medium-sized Enterprises ( MSMEs) in the V4 countries. The results of our research show that CSR strategies are most used by entrepreneurs and managers of MSMEs in Hungary, Poland and Slovakia. They are the least used in the Czech Republic. The sectoral comparison within the V4 countries highlighted interesting findings. When considering the moral and ethical implications of decision-making, no significant differences were found between the sectors. Differences were found in the perception of the CSR concept and its use in business. The CSR concept was mostly used in tourism and agriculture, to a lesser extent in construction, retail, manufacturing and services. Managers and entrepreneurs understand the link between CSR and gaining reputation and business opportunities and that CSR helps build a competitive advantage. The size of the company affects whether the company can be classified as CSR-oriented. Compared to medium-sized enterprises, micro- enterprises are 45% less likely and small enterprises are 33.5% less likely to be perceived as CSR-oriented. Compared to companies from Slovakia, companies in the Czech Republic are 41% less likely to be perceived as CSR-oriented. Hungarian companies are 70% more likely to be perceived as CSR-oriented compared to companies from Slovakia. Companies run by women are more inclined to apply CSR principles than men. en
utb.faculty Faculty of Management and Economics
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10563/1011050
utb.identifier.obdid 43883531
utb.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85135476912
utb.identifier.wok 000822355500002
utb.source J-wok
dc.date.accessioned 2022-07-18T13:31:11Z
dc.date.available 2022-07-18T13:31:11Z
dc.description.sponsorship Slovak Research and Development Agency [APVV-21-0188]
dc.description.sponsorship Agentúra na Podporu Výskumu a Vývoja, APVV: APVV-21-0188
dc.rights Attribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.rights.access openAccess
utb.contributor.internalauthor Bilan, Yuriy
utb.fulltext.affiliation Beata Gavurova, Jaroslav Schonfeld, Yuriy Bilan, Tomas Dudas Prof. Beata Gavurova, PhD. Faculty of Mining, Ecology, Process Control and Geotechnologies Technical University of Košice Slovakia E-mail: beata.gavurova@tuke.sk ORCID: 0000-0002-0606-879X Jaroslav Schonfeld, Ph.D Prague University of Economics and Business Czech Republic E-mail: jaroslav.schonfeld@vse.cz ORCID: 0000-0003-1737-6461 Prof. Yuriy Bilan, PhD. Tomas Bata University in Zlín Faculty of Management and Economics Czech Republic E-mail: yuriy_bilan@yahoo.co.uk ORCID: 0000-0003-0268-009X Journal of Competitiveness Assoc. Prof. Tomas Dudas, PhD. Pan-European University in Bratislava Faculty of Economics and Entrepreneurship Slovakia E-mail: tomas.dudas@paneurouni.com ORCID: 0000-0001-8931-8987
utb.fulltext.dates Received: January, 2022 1st Revision: May, 2022 Accepted: June, 2022
utb.fulltext.references 1. Ahmad, N., Ullah, Z., Arshad, M. Z., Kamran, K., Scholz, M., & Han, H. (2021). Relationship between corporate social responsibility at the micro-level and environmental performance: The mediating role of employee pro-environmental behavior and the moderating role of gender. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 1138–1148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.02.034 2. Anastasiei, B., Voda, A. I., Florea, N., Costuleanu, L. C., & Clipa, C. I. (2020). Measuring the Big Five Personality Traits Effects on Managers’ Propensity to Take Risks. Transformations in Business & Economics, 19 (2B(50B)), 944–959. 3. Aslaksen, H. M., Hildebrandt, C. Johnsen, & H. C. G. (2021). The long-term transformation of the concept of CSR: towards a more comprehensive emphasis on sustainability. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 6, 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-021-00063-9 4. Barauskaite, G., & Streimikiene, D. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance of companies: The puzzle of concepts, definitions and assessment methods. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28, 278–287. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2048 5. Barnett, M. L., & Henriques, I. B.W. (2020). Husted Beyond Good Intentions: Designing CSR Initiatives for Greater Social Impact. Journal of Management, 46 (6), 937–964. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206319900539 6. Belas, J., Çera, G., Dvorský, J., & Čepel, M. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and sustainability issues of small- and medium-sized enterprises. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28, 721–730. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2083 7. Bercu, A. M., Tofan, M., Roman, A., & Vatamanu, A. F. (2020). Public Sector Performance in EU Countries. Key Features and Perspectives. Transformations in Business & Economics, 19 (2B(50B)), 687–702. 8. Calvo-Mora, A., Domínguez-CC, M., & Criado, F. (2018). Assessment and improvement of organisational social impact through the EFQM Excellence Model. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 29 (6), 1259–1278. 9. Čaplánová, A., & Willett, K. (2019). Emission Discharge Permit Trading and Persistant Air Pollutants (A Common Pool Market Application with Health Risk Specifications). International Advances in Economic Research, 25 (1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-019-09720-z 10. Carlini, J., Grace, D., France, C., & Lo Iacono, J. (2019). The corporate social responsibility (CSR) employer brand process: integrative review and comprehensive model. Journal of Marketing Management, 35 (1), 182–205. 11. Carroll, A. B. (2021). Corporate Social Responsibility: Perspectives on the CSR Construct’s Development and Future. Business & Society, 60 (6), 1258–1278. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503211001765 12. Du, Y. C., & Wang, R. X. (2020). Impact of Corporate Governance Ability on Capital Gains in Mixed Ownership Enterprises. Transformations in Business & Economics, 19 (2(50), 92–113. 13. Dupire, M., & M’Zali, B. (2018). CSR Strategies in Response to Competitive Pressures. Journal of Business Ethics, 148 (3), 603–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2981-x 14. Džupina, M., & Džupinová, Z. (2019). Dimensions of CSRE in Online Communication of Pharmaceutical Companies: A Comparative Study. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Knowledge, 6 (2), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.12345-0009 15. Farid, T., Iqbal, S., Khan, A., Ma, J., Khattak, A., & Naseer Ud Din, M. (2020). The impact of authentic leadership on organizational citizenship behaviors: The mediating role of affective and cognitive-based trust. Frontiers in Psycholog y, 11, 1975. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01975 16. Fernández-Gago, R., Cabeza-García, L., & Godos-Díez, J. L. (2020). How significant is corporate social responsibility to business research? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, In Press. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1927 17. Fourati, Y. M., & Dammak, M. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: International evidence of the mediating role of reputation. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28, 1749–1759. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2143 18. Gallardo-Vázquez, D., & Lizcano-Álvarez, J. L. (2020). CSR-related competitiveness and legitimacy in MSMEs. Economics and Sociolog y, 13 (1), 52–73. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2020/13-1/4 19. Garde-Sanchez, R., Lopez-Perez, M. V., & Lopez-Hernandez, A. M. (2018). Current Trends in Research on Social Responsibility in State-Owned Enterprises: A Review of the Literature from 2000 to 2017. Sustainability, 10 (7), 2403. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072403 20. Giovanna, C., De Massis, A., & Cassia, L. (2012). The relationship between motivations and actions in corporate social responsibility: An exploratory study. International Journal of Business and Society, 13 (3), 391. 21. Grosser, T. J., Obstfeld, D., Choi, E. W., Woehler, M., Lopez-Kidwell, V., Labianca, G., & Borgatti, S. P. (2018). A Sociopolitical Perspective on Employee Innovativeness and Job Performance: The Role of Political Skill and Network Structure. Organization Science, INFORMS, 29 (4), 612–632. 22. Grumstrup, E. J., Sorensen, T., Misiuna, J., & Pachocka, M. (2021). Immigration and Voting Patterns in the European Union: Evidence from Five Case Studies and Cross-Country Analysis. Migration Letters, 18 (5), 573–589. https://doi.org/10.33182/ml.v18i5.943 23. Guo, M., Ahmad, N., Adnan, M., Scholz, M., Khalil-ur-Rehman, & Naveed, R. T. (2021). The Relationship of CSR and Employee Creativity in the Hotel Sector: The Mediating Role of Job Autonomy. Sustainability, 13, 10032. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810032 24. Hadj, T. B. (2020). Effects of corporate social responsibility towards stakeholders and environmental management on responsible innovation and competitiveness. Journal of Cleaner Production, 250, 119490. 25. Hategan, C. D., Sirghi, N., Curea-Pitorac, R. I., & Hategan, V. P. (2018). Doing Well or Doing Good: The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profit in Romanian Companies. Sustainability, 10 (4), 1041. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041041 26. Kabir, H. (2021). Notion of Belonging in the Nation-State: Gendered Construction of International Migration Aspirations among University Students in Bangladesh. Migration Letters, 18 (4), 463–476. https://doi.org/10.33182/ml.v18i4.1158 27. Karwowski, M., & Raulinajtys-Grzybek, M. (2021). The application of corporate social responsibility (CSR) actions for mitigation of environmental, social, corporate governance (ESG) and reputational risk in integrated reports. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28, 1270–1284. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2137 28. Khan, M. A., Yasir, M., & Khan, M. A. (2021). Factors Affecting Customer Loyalty in the Services Sector. Journal of Tourism and Services, 22 (12), 184–197. https://doi.org/10.29036/jots.v12i22.257 29. Khoo, E. S., Lim, Y., Lu, L. Y., & Monroe, G. S. (2021). Corporate social responsibility performance and the reputational incentives of independent directors. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, In Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12569 30. Kolk, A. (2016). The social responsibility of international business: From ethics and the environment to CSR and sustainable development. Journal of World Business, 51 (1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2015.08.010. 31. Kong, Y., Antwi-Adjei, A., & Bawuah, J. (2020). A systematic review of the business case for corporate social responsibility and firm performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27 (2), 444–454. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1838 32. KPMG. (2020). The time has come: The KPMG Survey of Sustainability Reporting 2020. Retrieved from: https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/xx/pdf/2020/12/the-time-has-come-executive-summary.pdf 33. Li, L., Zheng, X., & Zhang, J. (2020). Financial Reporting Quality and Firm Innovation: Evidence from China. Transformations in Business & Economics, 19 (3C(51C)), 508–521. 34. Litfin, T., Meeh-Bunse, G., Luer, K., & Teckert, O. (2017). Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting - a Stakeholder’s Perspective Approach. Business Systems Research Journal, 8 (1), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1515/bsrj-2017-0003 35. Liu, D., Jiang, K., Shalley, C. E., Keem, S., & Zhou, J. (2016). Motivational mechanisms of employee creativity: A meta-analytic examination and theoretical extension of the creativity literature. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Process, 137, 236–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.08.001 36. Lu, J., Ren, L., Yao, A., Qiao, J., Mikalauskiene, A., & Streimikis, J. (2020). Exploring the relationship between corporate social responsibility and firm competitiveness. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 33 (1), 1621–1646. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1761419 37. Magdich, A., Szenderák, J., & Harangi-Rákos, M. (2021). Economic diversification in resource-based economies: Norway experience. Pressburg Economic Review, 1, 27–36. 38. Metzker, Z., & Streimikis, J. (2020). CSR activities in the Czech SME segment. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Knowledge, 8 (1), 49–64. https://ideas.repec.org/a/jek/journl/v8y2020i1p49-64.html 39. Metzker, Z., & Zvarikova, K. (2021). The Perception of Company Employees by SMEs with CSR Concept Implementation. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Knowledge, 9 (1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.37335/ijek.v9i1.128 40. Metzker, Z., Marousek, J., Hlawiczka, R., Belas, J. Jr., & Khan, K. A. (2021b). The Perception of the Market and Operational Area of Business by Service Sector and Tourism Companies in terms of CSR implementation. Journal of Tourism and Services, 23 (12), 217–236. https://doi.org/10.29036/jots.v12i23.328 41. Metzker, Z., Marousek, J., Zvarikova, K., & Hlawiczka, R. (2021a). The perception of SMEs bankruptcy concerning CSR implementation. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Knowledge, 9(2), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.37335/ijek.v9i2.133 42. Paulík, J., Kombo, F., & Ključnikov, A. (2015). CSR as a driver of satisfaction and loyalty in commercial banks in the Czech Republic. Journal of International Studies, 8 (3), 112–127. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2015/8-3/9 43. Pfajfar, G., Shoham, A., Małecka, A., & Zalaznik, M. (2022). Value of corporate social responsibility for multiple stakeholders and social impact – Relationship marketing perspective. Journal of Business Research, 143, 43–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.051 44. Priede-Bergamini, T., Lopez-Cozar-Navarro, C., & Benito-Hernandez, S. (2020). Cooperation Behavior towards Innovation: Examining Differences between Family and Non-Family Businesses. Transformations in Business & Economics, 19 (3(51)), 310–328. 45. Přívara, A. (2021) Labour market efficiency and emigration in Slovakia and EU neighbouring countries. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 34 (1), 1850–1869. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1858131 46. Privara, A., & Rievajová, E. (2021). Migration governance in Slovakia during the COVID-19 crisis. Migration Letters, 18 (3), 331–338. https://doi.org/10.33182/ml.v18i3.1469 47. Qi, R. K., & Zhang, B. S. (2020). Does Admission to the Rich List Drive Listed Companies Improve Corporate Social Responsibility? Transformations in Business & Economics, 19 (3(51)), 74–97. 48. Sahoo, M., & Pradhan, J. (2021). Adaptation and acculturation: Resettling displaced tribal communities from wildlife sanctuaries in India. Migration Letters, 18 (3), 237–259. https://doi.org/10.33182/ml.v18i3.877 49. Santos-Jaén, J. M., Madrid-Guijarro, A., & García-Pérez-de-Lema, D. (2021). The impact of corporate social responsibility on innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises: The mediating role of debt terms and human capital. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28 (4), 1200–1215. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2125 50. Skare, M., Tomic, D., & Kristek, I. (2020). Terms of Trade Impact on International Trade: A Panel Cointegration Analysis. Transformations in Business & Economics, 19 (3(51)), 136–158. 51. Smekalova, L., Hajek, O., Belas, J., & Machacek, J. (2014). Perception of Small and Medium Entrepreneurship in the Czech Republic. Journal of Competitiveness, 6 (4), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2014.04.03 52. Stefancik, R., Némethová, I., & Seresová, T. (2021). Securitisation of Migration in the Language of Slovak Far-Right Populism. Migration Letters, 18 (6), 731–744. https://doi.org/10.33182/ml.v18i6.1387 53. Virglerova, Z., Kliestik, T., Rowland, Z., & Rozsa, Z. (2020). Barriers to Internationalization of SMEs in Visegrad Countries. Transformations in Business & Economics, 19 (3(51)), 58–73. 54. Vo, H. D., Van, T. H. L., Dinh, T. H. L., & Ho, M. C. (2020). Financial inclusion, corporate social responsibility and customer loyalty in the banking sector in Vietnam. Journal of International Studies, 13 (4), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2020/13-4/1 55. Vorobeva, E., & Dana, L. P. (2021). The COVID-19 pandemic and migrant entrepreneurship: Responses to the market shock. Migration Letters, 18 (4), 477–485. https://doi.org/10.33182/ml.v18i4.1400 56. Yang, H., Zhang, Y., Song, X., & Yang, J. (2020). A Study on the Sustainable Development of Local Culture of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area - Taking JiangMen BinJiang New Area as an Example. Transformations in Business & Economics, 19 (3C(51C)), 659–677.
utb.fulltext.sponsorship This work was supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency under the Contract no. APVV-21-0188.
utb.wos.affiliation [Gavurova, Beata] Tech Univ Kosice, Fac Min Ecol Proc Control & Geotechnol, Kosice, Slovakia; [Schonfeld, Jaroslav] Prague Univ Econ & Business, Prague, Czech Republic; [Bilan, Yuriy] Tomas Bata Univ Zlin, Fac Management & Econ, Zlin, Czech Republic; [Dudas, Tomas] Pan European Univ Bratislava, Fac Econ & Entrepreneurship, Bratislava, Slovakia
utb.scopus.affiliation Faculty of Mining, Ecolog y, Process Control and Geotechnologies Technical University of Košice, Slovakia; Pan-European University in Bratislava, Faculty of Economics and Entrepreneurship, Slovakia; Prague University of Economics and Business, Czech Republic; Tomas Bata University in Zlín, Faculty of Management and Economics, Czech Republic
utb.fulltext.projects APVV-21-0188
utb.fulltext.faculty Faculty of Management and Economics
utb.fulltext.ou -
utb.identifier.jel O11
utb.identifier.jel M23
utb.identifier.jel L13
Find Full text

Soubory tohoto záznamu

Zobrazit minimální záznam

Attribution 4.0 International Kromě případů, kde je uvedeno jinak, licence tohoto záznamu je Attribution 4.0 International