Publikace UTB
Repozitář publikační činnosti UTB

The use of industrial lean management methods in the economics practice: An empirical study of the production companies in the Czech Republic

Repozitář DSpace/Manakin

Zobrazit minimální záznam


dc.title The use of industrial lean management methods in the economics practice: An empirical study of the production companies in the Czech Republic en
dc.contributor.author Gálová, Kateřina
dc.contributor.author Rajnoha, Rastislav
dc.contributor.author Ondra, Pavel
dc.relation.ispartof Polish Journal of Management Studies
dc.identifier.issn 2081-7452 Scopus Sources, Sherpa/RoMEO, JCR
dc.date.issued 2018
utb.relation.volume 17
utb.relation.issue 1
dc.citation.spage 93
dc.citation.epage 104
dc.type article
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher Czestochowa University of Technology
dc.identifier.doi 10.17512/pjms.2018.17.1.08
dc.relation.uri https://pjms.zim.pcz.pl/resources/html/article/details?id=174927
dc.subject business performance management en
dc.subject industrial engineering methods en
dc.subject business process improvement en
dc.subject lean management en
dc.description.abstract Companies are encouraged to make changes and improve business processes to achieve performance and competitiveness. For these purposes, industrial engineering methods can be used in business practice. The main aim of this paper is to identify the most frequently used industrial engineering methods in Czech manufacturing companies. The secondary aim is to compare the use of individual industrial engineering methods in selected industrial areas. The necessary data were collected through online questionnaire (N=118). The results shows, that the most commonly used industrial engineering method are standardization, Material Requirements Planning (MRP I), Manufacturing Resource Planning (MRP II), 5S and Kaizen. This study confirms that the use of standardization, 5S, Kaizen, and MRP I depends on the type of industry in which the company operates; the industry focus does not affect whether or not TQM or MRP II are used. en
dc.description.abstract Firmy są zachęcane do wprowadzania zmian i ulepszania procesów biznesowych w celu osiągnięcia wydajności i konkurencyjności. W tym celu w praktyce biznesowej można stosować metody inżynierii przemysłowej. Głównym celem tego artykułu jest identyfikacja najczęściej stosowanych metod inżynierii przemysłowej w czeskich zakładach produkcyjnych. Drugim celem jest porównanie wykorzystania poszczególnych metod inżynierii przemysłowej w wybranych obszarach przemysłowych. Niezbędne dane zebrano za pomocą kwestionariusza internetowego (N=118). Wyniki pokazują, że najczęściej stosowaną metodą inżynierii przemysłowej jest standaryzacja, planowanie zapotrzebowania materiałowego (MRP I), planowanie zasobów produkcyjnych (MRP II), 5S i Kaizen. Badanie to potwierdza, że zastosowanie normalizacji, 5S, Kaizen i MRP I zależy od rodzaju branży, w której działa firma; koncentracja na branży nie ma wpływu na to, czy stosuje się TQM, czy MRP II. pl
utb.faculty Faculty of Management and Economics
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10563/1008106
utb.identifier.obdid 43878200
utb.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85050565146
utb.identifier.wok 000437256100008
utb.source j-wok
dc.date.accessioned 2018-08-03T12:49:41Z
dc.date.available 2018-08-03T12:49:41Z
dc.description.sponsorship Internal Grant Agency of FaME TBU [IGA/FaME/2017/015]
dc.rights Attribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.rights.access openAccess
utb.contributor.internalauthor Gálová, Kateřina
utb.contributor.internalauthor Rajnoha, Rastislav
utb.contributor.internalauthor Ondra, Pavel
utb.fulltext.affiliation Gálová K., Rajnoha R. , Ondra P. * * Kateřina Gálová, Eng., Tomas Bata University in Zlín, Czech Republic; Rastislav Rajnoha, Assoc. Prof. PhD, Tomas Bata University in Zlín, Czech Republic; Pavel Ondra, Eng., Tomas Bata University in Zlín, Czech Republic ✉ Corresponding author: rajnoha@utb.cz ✉ kgalova@utb.cz; ondra@utb.cz
utb.fulltext.dates Received January 4, 2018 Revised March 11, 2018 Accepted April 4, 2018
utb.fulltext.references Afonina A., 2015, Strategic management tools and techniques and organizational performance: Findings from the Czech Republic, “Journal of Competitiveness”, 7(3). Anand G., Kodali R., 2009, Selection of lean manufacturing systems using the analytic network process – a case study, “Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management”, 20(2). Chan F.T.S., Lau H.C.W., Ip R.W.L., Chan H.K., Kong S., 2005, Implementation of total productive maintenance: A case study, “International Journal of Production Economics”, 95(1). Corbett L.M., 2011, Lean six sigma: the contribution to business excellence, “International Journal of Lean Six sigma”, 2(2). Dahlgaard J., Dahlgaard-Park S., 2006, Lean production, six sigma quality, TQM and company culture, “The TQM Magazine”, 18(3). Dahlgaard-Park S., Pettersen J., 2009, Defining lean production: Some conceptual and practical issues, “The TQM Journal”, 21(2). Domingo R., Alvarez R., Pena M.M., Calvo R., 2007, Materials flow improvement in a lean assembly line: A case study, “Assembly Automation”, 27(2). Eswaramoorthi M., Kathiresan G.R., Prasad P.S.S., Mohanram P.V., 2011, A survey on lean practices in Indian machine tool industries, “The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology”, 52(9). Farris J.A., Van Aken E., Doolen T.L., Worley J., 2015, Learning from less successful Kaizen events: A case study, “Engineering Management Journal”, 20(3). Gavurová B., 2011, Systém Balanced Scorecard v podnikovom riadení, „Ekonomický časopis“, 59(2). Gavurová B., Belás J., Kočišová K., Klieštik T., 2017, Comparison of selected methods for performance evaluation of Czech and Slovak commercial banks, “Journal of Business Economics and Management”, 18(5). Ghalayini A.M., Noble J.S., Crowe T.J., 1997, An integrated dynamic performance measurement system for improving manufacturing competitiveness, “International Journal of Production Economics”, 48(3). Hornungová J., 2017, Nonfinancial performance evaluation as significant area of strategic business management, “Business: Theory and Practice”, 18. Illmeyer M., Grosch D., Kittler M., Priess P., 2017, The impact of financial management on innovation, “Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues”, 5(1). Kaushik P., Khanduja D., 2009, Application of Six Sigma DMAIC methodology in thermal power plants: A case study, “Total Quality Management & Business Excellence”, 20(2). Knápková A., Homolka L., Pavelková D., 2014, Utilization of Balanced Scorecard and the effect of its use on the Financial Performance of Companies in the Czech Republic, “E + M Ekonomie a Management”, 17(2). Korauš A., Štefko R., Dobrovič J., 2015, Acquisition Activity in Financial Sector. European Financial Systems 2015, Proceedings of the 12 th International Scientific Conference. Mahmud M., Aryanto V.D.W., Hasyim H., 2017, The effect of innovation capability and new product development on marketing performance of batik SMEs, “Polish Journal of Management Studies”, 15(2). Miller G., Pawloski J., Standridge CH.R., 2010, A case study of lean, sustainable manufacturing, “Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management”, 3(1). Mir-Babayev R., Gulaliyev M., Shikhaliyeva S., Azizova R., Ok N., 2017, The impact of cultural diversity on innovation performance: Evidence from construction industry of Azerbaijan, “Economics and Sociology”, 10(1). Rahman N.A.A., Sharif S.M., Esa M.M., 2013, Lean manufacturing case study with Kanban system implementation, “Procedia Economics and Finance”, 7. Rajnoha R., Lorincová S., 2015, Strategic management of business performance based on innovations and information support in specific conditions of Slovakia, “Journal of Competitiveness”, 7(1). Rajnoha R., Lesníková P., 2016, Strategic performance management system and corporate sustainability concept-specific parameters in Slovak enterprises, “Journal of Competitiveness”, 8(3). Sahin F., 2000, Manufacturing competitiveness: Different systems to achieve the same results, “Production and Inventory Management Journal”, 41(1). Salvendy G., 2001, Handbook of industrial engineering: Technology and operations management, (3 rd ed.), New York: Wiley. Singh R., Gohil A.M., Shah D.V., Desai S., 2013, Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) Implementation in a machine shop: A case study, “Procedia Engineering”, 51. Sjoberg I.K., Johnsen A., Solberg J., 2012, Quantifying the effect of using Kanban versus Scrum: A case study, “IEEE Software”, 29(5). Šoltés V., Gavurová B., 2015, Modification of performance measurement system in the intentions of globalization trends, “Polish Journal of Management Studies”, 11(2). Tsang A.H.C., Chan P.K., 2000, TPM implementation in China: A case study, “International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management”, 17(2). Tuček D., Hájková M., Tučková Z., 2013, Utilization level of business management in Czech enterprises - objectives and factors, “E + M Ekonomie a Management”, 16(2). Wee H.M., Wu S., 2009, Lean supply chain and its effect on product cost and quality: a case study on Ford Motor Company, “Supply Chain Management: An International Journal”, 14(5). Wnuk-Pel T., 2016, Management accounting systems and Lean management: a service company perspective, “Transformation in Business & Economics”, 15(1).
utb.fulltext.sponsorship Authors are thankful to the Internal Grant Agency of FaME TBU No. IGA/FaME/2017/015 “Impact of selected industrial engineering methods on the overall business performance and process efficiency” for financial support to carry out this research .
utb.wos.affiliation [Galova, K.; Rajnoha, R.; Ondra, P.] Tomas Bata Univ, Zlin, Czech Republic
utb.fulltext.projects IGA/FaME/2017/015
Find Full text

Soubory tohoto záznamu

Zobrazit minimální záznam

Attribution 4.0 International Kromě případů, kde je uvedeno jinak, licence tohoto záznamu je Attribution 4.0 International