Testing the main differences and mediating effects of the coping scales

Vaculíková, Jitka

dc.title	Testing the main differences and mediating effects of the coping scales	en
dc.contributor.author	Vaculíková, Jitka
dc.relation.ispartof	Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology
dc.identifier.issn	2146-7242 Scopus Sources, Sherpa/RoMEO, JCR
dc.date.issued	2017
utb.relation.volume	2017
utb.relation.issue	December Special Issue INTE
dc.citation.spage	91
dc.citation.epage	98
dc.type	article
dc.language.iso	en
dc.publisher	Sakarya University
dc.subject	Personality	en
dc.subject	Proactive	en
dc.subject	Well-being	en
dc.description.abstract	The aim of the study was to examine to what extent personality traits and individual variables are related to the use of proactive and preventive coping. The research sample consisted of 442 full-time university students in helping professions. The results showed that older students tended to be more proactive while men used slightly more preventive coping strategies than women. Moreover, controlling for respondents’ well-being had a significant effect on the strength of the relationship between these two variables. In addition, proactive coping, social support and depression explained 47% of the variance in well-being, with the strongest unique contribution being depression. © The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology.	en
utb.faculty	Faculty of Humanities
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10563/1007851
utb.identifier.obdid	43877728
utb.identifier.scopus	2-s2.0-85044707852
utb.source	j-scopus
dc.date.accessioned	2018-04-23T15:01:48Z
dc.date.available	2018-04-23T15:01:48Z
utb.contributor.internalauthor	Vaculíková, Jitka
utb.fulltext.affiliation	Jitka VACULÍKOVÁ Research Centre, Tomas Bata University in Zlín, Zlín, Czech Republic Research Centre, Faculty of Humanities TBU, nám. T. G. Masaryka 1279, 760 01 Zlín, Czech Republic. jvaculikova@fhs.utb.cz
utb.fulltext.dates	-
utb.fulltext.references	Almássy, Z., Pék, G., & Papp, G. (2014). The psychometric properties of the Hungarian version of the Proactive Coping Inventory: Reliability, construct validity and factor structure. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 14(1), 115–124. Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory-II. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation. Blais, M. A, Lenderking, W. R., Baer, L., deLorell, A., Peets, K., Leahy, L., & Burns, C. (1999). Development and initial validation of a brief mental health outcome measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 73(3), 359–73. De Ridder, D. T. D., & Kerssens, J. (2003). Owing to the force of circumstances? The impact of situational features and personal characteristics on coping patterns across situations. Psychology and Health, 18, 217–236. doi:10.1080/0887044021000044242 Dragomirecká, E., Lenderking, W. R, Motlová, L., Goppoldová, E., & Šelepová, P. (2006). A brief mental health outcomes measure: Translation and validation of the Czech version of the Schwartz Outcomes Scale-10. Quality of Life Research, 15(2), 307–312. doi:10.1007/s11136-005-1389-y Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (and sex and drugs and rock 'n'roll). London: Sage. Gan, Y., Hu, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2010). Proactive and preventive coping in adjustment to college. The Psychological Record, 60(4), 1–15. Gan, Y., Yang, M., Zhou, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2007). The two-factor structure of future-oriented coping and its mediating role in student engagement. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 851–863. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.02.009 Greenglass, E. R. (2002). Proactive coping. In. E. Frydenberg (Ed.), Beyond coping: Meeting goals, visions and challenges (pp. 37-62). London: Oxford University Press Greenglass, E. R., & Fiksenbaum, L. (2009). Proactive coping, positive affect, and well-being: Testing for mediation using Path analysis. European Psychologist, 14(1), 29–39. doi:10.1027/1016-9040.14.1.29 Greenglass, E. R., Fiksenbaum, L., & Eaton, J. (2006). The relationship between coping, social support, functional disability and depression in the elderly. Anxienty, Stress, & Coping, 19, 15–31. doi:10.1080/14659890500436430 Greenglass, E. R., Schwarzer, R., & Taubert, S. (1999). The Proactive Coping Inventory (PCI): A multidimensional research instrument. Retrieved from http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/~health/greenpci.htm Kožený, J., & Tišanská, L. (2003). Dotazník sociální opory MOS: Vnitřní struktura nástroje [Social Support Survey MOS: Internal structure]. Československá psychologie, 47(2), 135–143. Matud, M. P., Ibáñez, I., Bethencourt, J. M., Marrero, R., & Carballeira, M. (2003). Structural gender differences in perceived social support. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(8), 1919–1929. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00041-2 Ouwehand, C., De Ridder, D. T. D., & Bensing, J. M. (2006). Situational aspects are more important in shaping proactive coping behaviour than individual characteristics: A vignette study among adults preparing for ageing. Psychology and Health, 21, 809–825. Ouwehand, C., de Ridder, D. T. D., Bensing, J. M. (2008). Individual differences in the use of proactive coping strategies by middle-aged and older adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 28–33. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.02.013 Pill, R., Peters, T., J., & Robling, M. R. (1995). Social class and preventive health behaviour: A British example. Journal of Epidemiol Community Health, 49, 28–32. Preiss, M., & Vacíř, K. (1999). BDI–II. Beckova sebeposuzovací škála pro dospělé BDI [BDI–II. Beck Depression Inventory]. Brno: Psychodiagnostika. Reuter, T., & Schwarzer, R. (2009). Manage stress at work through preventive and proactive coping. In EA Locke (Ed.), Handbook of principles of organizational behavior (pp. 499–516). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Schwarzer R, & Taubert S (2002). Tenacious goal pursuits and striving toward personal growth: Proactive coping. In E Fydenberg (Ed.), Beyond coping: Meeting goals, visions and challenges (pp. 19–35). London: Oxford University Press. Sherbourne, C. D., & Stewart, A. L. (1991). The MOS social support survey. Social Science & Medicine, 32(6), 705–14. Sirota, N. A., & Yaroslavskaya, M. A. (2014). The research of proactive coping behavior of patients with schizotypal personality disorder. Medical Psychology in Russia, 24, 1–7. Retrieved from http://www.mprj.ru/english%20version/2014_1_24/nomer01_sod.pdf Šolcová, I., Lukavský, J., & Greenglass, E. R. (2006). Dotazník proaktivního zvládání životních situací [The Proactive Coping Inventory: Czech adaptation]. Československá Psychologie, 50(2), 148–162. Sollar, T., & Sollarova, E. (2009). Proactive coping from the perspective of age, gender and education. Studia Psychologica, 51(2-3), 161–165. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon. Vaculíková, J. (2016). Proactive coping behavior in sample of university students in helping professions. Sociální pedagogika/Social Education, 4(2), 38–55. doi:10.7441/soced.2016.04.02.03 Vaculíková, J. (2017). Testing uni-dimensionality of the proactive and preventive coping. Manuscript submitted for publication. Vernon, L. L., Dillon, J. M., & Steiner, A. R. W. (2009). Proactive coping, gratitude, and posttraumatic stress disorder in college women. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 22, 117–127. doi:10.1080/10615800802203751
utb.fulltext.sponsorship	-
utb.scopus.affiliation	Research Centre, Tomas Bata University in Zlín, Zlín, Czech Republic; Research Centre, Faculty of Humanities, TBU, Nám. T. G. Masaryka 1279, Zlín, Czech Republic
utb.fulltext.projects	-