Comparison of MCDM methods with users' evaluation

Králík, Lukáš; Šenkeřík, Roman; Jašek, Roman

Název:

Autor:

Králík, Lukáš; Šenkeřík, Roman; Jašek, Roman

Typ dokumentu:

Článek ve sborníku (English)

Zdrojový dok.:

2016 11th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI). 2016, vol. 2016-July

ISSN:

2166-0727 (Sherpa/RoMEO, JCR)

Journal Impact This chart shows the development of journal-level impact metrics in time

JCR	Journal Citation Reports - Impact Factor
SNIP	SCImago Source Normalized Impact per Paper
SJR	SCImago Journal Rank
IPP	SCImago Impact per Publication
CS	Scopus CiteScore

(Note: The metrics are not comparable against one another.)

ISBN:

9789899843462

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1109/CISTI.2016.7521387

Abstrakt:

This paper responds to requirement to improve the orientation between offered SW, as ITIL tools. There are really a lot of amount thus offered tools and very often leads to poor implementation of ITIL on the basis of incorrectly chosen tools. Main objective of this paper is to provide an overview about possibilities of choosing a suitable tool. Simultaneously, the research described in this paper will serve for further work on creating a methodology for evaluation of ITIL tools. © 2016 AISTI.

Plný text:

http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7521387/

Zobrazit celý záznam

Soubory tohoto záznamu

Název: Fulltext_1006650.pdf

Velikost: 254.3Kb

Formát: PDF

Popis: fulltext

Citace ČSN ISO 690:2011

Citace článku v konferenčním sborníku:
KRÁLÍK, Lukáš, Roman ŠENKEŘÍK a Roman JAŠEK. Comparison of MCDM methods with users' evaluation. In: 2016 11th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI) [online]. IEEE Computer Society, 2016 [cit. 2024-04-25]. ISSN 2166-0727. Dostupné z: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7521387/.

Tyto citace vytvořil software a mohou obsahovat chyby. Pro ověření přesnosti si nastudujte příslušnou citační normu nebo příručku.