Publikace UTB
Repozitář publikační činnosti UTB

Investigation of the optimal arch design of the last for heel-heighted shoe with low, mid and high heel height

Repozitář DSpace/Manakin

Zobrazit minimální záznam


dc.title Investigation of the optimal arch design of the last for heel-heighted shoe with low, mid and high heel height en
dc.contributor.author Zhou, Jin
dc.contributor.author Zhang, Weiwen
dc.contributor.author Hlaváček, Petr
dc.contributor.author Xu, Bo
dc.contributor.author Chen, Wuyong
dc.relation.ispartof Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Advanced Materials and Systems, ICAMS 2012
dc.date.issued 2012
dc.citation.spage 401
dc.citation.epage 406
dc.event.title 4th International Conference on Advanced Materials and Systems, ICAMS 2012
dc.event.location Bucharest
utb.event.state-en Romania
utb.event.state-cs Rumunsko
dc.event.sdate 2012-09-27
dc.event.edate 2012-09-29
dc.type conferenceObject
dc.language.iso en
dc.subject Arch shape of last. en
dc.subject High heel shoes en
dc.subject Insole pressure en
dc.description.abstract This study aimed at evaluating the effect of arch shape of the last on the insole pressure distribution of lady shoes with 20mm, 50mm and 80mm heel height. The right foot of ten girls in barefoot standing on the shoe heel was scanned in 3D format in order to obtain the data of foot arch. Three types of last were designed: control last (CL), higher last (HL) and lower last (LL). The arch shape of CL was designed based on the foot, while the arch of HL and LL was modified by 2.5mm higher or lower than that of control last in the position of cuboids. Insole pressure variables of peak pressure (PP), contact area (CA) and pressure-time integral (PTI) at hind, mid and fore foot were analyzed by paired-T test with the significant level of 0.05. The result shows that no significant differences were observed in mid foot between comparisons of HL and CL and CL and LL in each heel height. However, HL demonstrated a significantly lower PP and PTI than CL at forefoot in the 20mm and at hind foot in the 80mm heel height respectively; while LL only demonstrated a significantly larger PP than CL under hind foot in 50mm heel height. It can be concluded as that the last with an appropriate arch support was helpful for attenuating the magnitude of pressure in forefoot and hind foot. en
utb.faculty Faculty of Technology
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10563/1004683
utb.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-84888242845
utb.source d-scopus
dc.date.accessioned 2015-06-04T12:54:56Z
dc.date.available 2015-06-04T12:54:56Z
utb.contributor.internalauthor Zhou, Jin
utb.contributor.internalauthor Hlaváček, Petr
Find Full text

Soubory tohoto záznamu

Zobrazit minimální záznam