Kontaktujte nás | Jazyk: čeština English
dc.title | Green growth in the OECD countries: A multivariate analytical approach | en |
dc.contributor.author | Gavurová, Beáta | |
dc.contributor.author | Megyesiová, Silvia | |
dc.contributor.author | Hudák, Matej | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Energies | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1996-1073 Scopus Sources, Sherpa/RoMEO, JCR | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
utb.relation.volume | 14 | |
utb.relation.issue | 20 | |
dc.type | article | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | MDPI | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/en14206719 | |
dc.relation.uri | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/20/6719 | |
dc.subject | green growth | en |
dc.subject | OECD | en |
dc.subject | productivity | en |
dc.subject | intensity | en |
dc.subject | exposure to ambient PM2.5 | en |
dc.subject | municipal waste | en |
dc.subject | public health | en |
dc.subject | correlation | en |
dc.subject | principal component analysis | en |
dc.subject | cluster analysis | en |
dc.description.abstract | Green growth is about merging environmental and social protection with economic growth. The OECD countries follow the progress toward greening though a set of indicators. The aim of the study is to analyze the condition and development of the OECD countries using a set of green growth indicators. The univariate and multivariate statistical approach was used to identify the main features of green growth development in two time spans. The achieved success of the OECD countries toward the green growth was measured from period 1 (years 2000–2009) to period 2 (years 2010–2019). For stimulant indicators, an increase was achieved, while for the destimulant variables, a decrease was reached between the analyzed periods. CO2 productivity increased by more than 31%, material productivity by 25%, and the energy productivity by nearly 21%. From the ecological point of view, a positive sign was achieved by an intensive increase of the percentage of municipal waste treatment by recycling or composting. The real GDP increased between periods in each of the OECD countries, except in Greece. The destimulant indicators decreased over time. The mortality declined by about 20% from exposure to ambient PM2.5 and thus the welfare costs of premature death from exposure to PM2.5 also declined. The decline of the mean population exposure to PM2.5 by 12.5% on average for the OECD countries is a positive signal for environmental protection and public health of the OECD population. Some uncertainty exists as the municipal waste generated per capita decreased only slightly by 2%. © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. | en |
utb.faculty | Faculty of Management and Economics | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10563/1010627 | |
utb.identifier.obdid | 43882641 | |
utb.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85117315434 | |
utb.identifier.wok | 000715451400001 | |
utb.source | j-scopus | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-01T19:57:44Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-11-01T19:57:44Z | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Research and Development Agency GA AA [21/2020] | |
dc.description.sponsorship | 21/2020 | |
dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International | |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.rights.access | openAccess | |
utb.ou | Center for Applied Economic Research | |
utb.contributor.internalauthor | Gavurová, Beáta | |
utb.fulltext.affiliation | Beata Gavurova 1, Silvia Megyesiova 2,* and Matej Hudak 2 1 Center for Applied Economic Research, Faculty of Management and Economics, Tomas Bata University in Zlín, 760 01 Zlín, Czech Republic; gavurova@utb.cz 2 Faculty of Business Economy, University of Economics in Bratislava, 041 30 Košice, Slovakia; matej.hudak@euba.sk * Correspondence: silvia.megyesiova@euba.sk | |
utb.fulltext.dates | Received: 22 September 2021 Accepted: 13 October 2021 Published: 15 October 2021 | |
utb.fulltext.references | 1. IMF. World Economic Outlook—April 2009: Crisis and Recovery. Available online: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2016/12/31/Crisis-and-Recovery (accessed on 15 July 2021). 2. OECD. Towards Green Growth? Tracking Progress; OECD Publishing, OECD Green Growth Studies: Paris, France, 2015. 3. OECD. Towards Green Growth; OECD Publishing, OECD Green Growth Studies: Paris, France, 2011. 4. Capasso, M.; Hansen, T.; Heiberg, J.; Klitkou, A.; Steen, M. Green growth—A synthesis of scientific findings. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2019, 146, 390–402. [CrossRef] 5. Kasztelan, A. Green growth, green economy and sustainable development: Terminological and relational discourse. Prague Econ. Pap. 2017, 26, 487–499. [CrossRef] 6. Gough, I. Can growth be green? Int. J. Health Serv. 2015, 45, 443–452. [CrossRef] 7. Fernandes, C.I.; Veiga, P.M.; Ferreira, J.J.M.; Hughes, M. Green growth versus economic growth: Do sustainable technology transfer and innovations lead to an imperfect choice? Bus. Strategy Environ. 2021, 30, 2021–2037. [CrossRef] 8. Hickel, J.; Kallis, G. Is green growth possible? New Political Econ. 2019, 25, 469–486. [CrossRef] 9. Dercon, S. Is green growth good for the poor? World Bank Res. Obs. 2014, 29, 163–185. [CrossRef] 10. Ossewaarde, M.; Ossewaarde-Lowtoo, R. The EU’s Green deal: A third Alternative to Green Growth and Degrowth? Sustainability 2020, 12, 9825. [CrossRef] 11. European Commission. Delivering the European Green Deal. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal/delivering-european-green-deal_en (accessed on 15 July 2021). 12. European Commission. A European Green Deal. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en (accessed on 17 July 2021). 13. OECD. Green Growth Indicators 2017; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2017. 14. Fanta, M. Water management in the Czech Republic: Transformation, restructuralization, and comparison of the current state of the branch with the state in 1993. Littera Scr. 2019, 12, 1–12. 15. Kabourková, K.; Stuchlý, J. Structural development of utilised agricultural area in EU countries subsidy policy of the Czech Republic. Literra Scr. 2019, 12, 1–17. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 16. Kmecová, I.; Tlustý, M.; Velková, V. The analysis of legal environment and administrative burden od SMEs as an obstacle to business. Literra Scr. 2020, 13, 135–152. 17. Vochozka, M.; Maroušková, A.; Šuleř, P. Economic, environmental and moral acceptance of renewable energy: A case study-the agricultural biogas plant at Pěčín. In Science and Engineering Ethics; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2017; Volume 24, pp. 299–305. 18. Maroušek, J.; Rowland, Z.; Valášková, K.; Král, P. Techno-economic assessment of potato waste management in developing economies. In Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy; Springer: New York, NJ, USA, 2020; Volume 22, pp. 937–944. ISSN 1618-954X. [CrossRef] 19. Škapa, S.; Vochozka, M. Towards Higher Moral and Economic Goals in Renewable Energy. In Science and Engineering Ethics; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2019; p. 10. [CrossRef] 20. Machová, V.; Vrbka, J. Value generators for businesses in agriculture. In Proceedings of the 12th International Days of Statistics and Economics Conference, Prague, Czech Republic, 6–8 September 2018; Tomáš, L., Tomáš, P., Eds.; Libuše Macáková, Melandrium: Prague, Czech Republic, 2018; pp. 1123–1132, ISBN 978-80-87990-14-8. 21. Kasych, A.; Horák, J.; Glukhova, V.; Bondarenko, S. The impact of intellectual capital on innovation activity of companies. In Quality-Access to Success; SRAC-Societatea Romana Pentru Asigurarea Calitatii: Bucharest, Romania, 2021; Volume 22, pp. 3–11. 22. Rousek, P. Environmental Footprint Evaluation of Eco-Friendly Products in the Global Economy. In SHS Web of Conferences: Innovative Economic Symposium 2018—Milestones and Trends of World Economy (IES2018); Horák, J., Ed.; EDP Sciences: Les Ulis, France, 2018; p. 4. [CrossRef] 23. Rousek, P.; Hašková, S. Changes in the Concept of Public Greenery on the Basis of an Analysis of Czech Municipal Financing. In SHS Web of Conferences-Innovative Economic Symposium 2017: Strategic Partnership in International Trade, 1st ed.; Váchal, J., Vochozka, M., Horák, J., Eds.; EDP Sciences: Les Ulis, France, 2017; p. 10. ISBN 978-2-7598-9028-6. 24. Kasych, A.; Šuleř, P.; Rowland, Z. Corporate environmental responsibility through the prism of strategic management. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9589. [CrossRef] 25. Pimonenko, T.; Bilan, Y.; Horák, J.; Starchenko, L.; Gajda, V. Green brand of companies and greenwashing under sustainable development goals. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1679. [CrossRef] 26. Stehel, V.; Horák, J.; Vochozka, M. Prediction of institutional sector development and analysis of enterprises active in agriculture. E+M Ekon. A Manag. 2019, 22, 103–118. [CrossRef] 27. Dogaru, L. Green Economy and Green Growth—Opportunities for Sustainable Development. Proceedings 2020, 63, 70. [CrossRef] 28. Nadányiová, M.; Gajanová, L. Consumers’ perception of green marketing as a source of competitive advantage in the hotel industry. Littera Scr. 2018, 11, 102–115. 29. Minárik, P. Institutional environment and agricultural production in post-communist Central European countries. Littera Scr. 2017, 10, 88–101. 30. Škare, M.; Tomić, D.; Stjepanović, S. Green business cycle: An analysis on China and France. Acta Montan. Slovaca 2020, 25, 563–576. [CrossRef] 31. Vochozka, M.; Horák, J.; Krulický, T.; Pardal, P. Predicting future Brent oil price on global markets. Acta Montan. Slovaca 2020, 25, 375–392. [CrossRef] 32. Kacerauskas, T. Creative Economy and the Idea of the Creative Society. Transform. Bus. Econ. 2020, 1, 43–52. 33. Du, J.; Peng, S.; Song, W.; Peng, J. Relationship between Enterprise Technological Diversification and Technology Innovation Performance: Moderating Role of Internal Resources and External Environment Dynamics. Transform. Bus. Econ. 2020, 19, 52–73. 34. Mazzoni, F. Circular economy and eco-innovation in Italian industrial clusters. Best practices from Prato textile cluster. Insights Reg. Dev. 2020, 2, 661–676. [CrossRef] 35. Vochozka, M.; Kalinová, E.; Gao, P.; Smolíková, L. Development of copper price from July 1959 and predicted development till the end of year 2022. Acta Montan. Slovaca 2021, 26, 262–280. [CrossRef] 36. Pietrzak, M.B.; Balcerzak, A.B. Selection of the set of areal units for economic regional research on the land use: A proposal for Aggregation Problem solution. Acta Montan. Slovaca 2021, 26, 222–223. 37. Pleta, T.; Tvaronavičienė, M.; Della Casa, S.; Agafonov, K. Cyber-attacks to critical energy infrastructure and management issues: ˙ Overview of selected cases. Insights Reg. Dev. 2020, 2, 703–715. [CrossRef] 38. Korshenkov, E.; Ignatyev, S. Empirical interpretation and measurement of the productivity and efficiency of regions: The case of Latvia. Insights Reg. Dev. 2020, 2, 549–561. [CrossRef] 39. Kelić, I.; Erceg, A.; Čandrlić Dankoš, I. Increasing tourism competitiveness: Connecting Blue and Green Croatia. J. Tour. Serv. 2020, 20, 132–149. [CrossRef] 40. Lee, C.M.; Chou, H.H. Green growth in Taiwan—An application of The OECD green Growth Monitoring Indicators. Singap. Econ. Rev. 2018, 63, 249–274. [CrossRef] 41. Sneideriene, A.; Viederyte, R.; Abele, L. Green growth assessment discourse on Evaluation indices in the European Union. Entrep. Sustain. Issues 2020, 8, 360–369. [CrossRef] 42. Van der Ploeg, R.; Withagen, C. Green growth, green paradox and the global economic crisis. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 2013, 6, 116–119. [CrossRef] 43. Khouri, S.; Behun, M.; Knapcikova, L.; Behunova, A.; Sofranko, M.; Rosova, A. Characterization of Customized Encapsulant Polyvinyl Butyral used in the solar industry and its impact on the environment. Energies 2020, 13, 5391. [CrossRef] 44. Tawiah, V.; Zakari, A.; Adedoyin, F.F. Determinants of green growth in developed and developing countries. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 39227–39242. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 45. Dovgal, O.; Goncharenko, N.; Reshetnyak, O.; Dovgal, G.; Danko, N. Priorities for Greening and the sustainable development of OECD member countries and Ukraine: A comparative analysis. Comp. Econ. Res.-Cent. East. Eur. 2021, 24, 45–63. [CrossRef] 46. OECD. OECD Stat. Available online: https://stats.oecd.org/ (accessed on 1 July 2021). 47. OECD. Measuring Distance to the SDG Targets 2019: An Assessment of Where OECD Countries Stand; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2019. [CrossRef] 48. The Sustainable Development Agenda—United Nations Sustainable Development. Available online: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/development-agenda/ (accessed on 10 July 2021). 49. Schmalensee, R. From “green growth” to sound policies: An overview. Energy Econ. 2012, 34, S2–S6. [CrossRef] 50. Loveday, R. Statistics; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2016. 51. Witte, R.S.; Witte, J.S. Statistics; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2017. 52. Simionescu, M. Testing Sigma Convergence across EU-28. Econ. Sociol. 2014, 7, 48–60. [CrossRef] 53. Das, R.C. Handbook of Research on Global Indicators of Economic and Political Convergence; Business Science Reference: Hershey, PA, USA, 2016. 54. Janssen, F.; Hende, A.V.D.; Beer, J.; Wissen, L.J.G. Sigma and beta convergence in regional mortality: A case study of the Netherlands. Demogr. Res. 2016, 35, 81–116. [CrossRef] 55. Fialová, K.; Želinský, T. Regional patterns of social differentiation in Visegrád countries. Czech Sociol. Rev. 2019, 55, 735–789. [CrossRef] 56. Yim, O.; Ramdeen, K.T. Hierarchical cluster Analysis: Comparison of Three LINKAGE measures and application to psychological data. Quant. Methods Psychol. 2015, 11, 8–21. [CrossRef] 57. Šoltés, E.; Vojtková, M.; Šoltésová, T. Changes in the geographical distribution of youth poverty and social exclusion in EU member countries between 2008 and 2017. Morav. Geogr. Rep. 2020, 28, 2–15. [CrossRef] 58. Szymańska, A. Reducing Socioeconomic Inequalities in the European Union in the Context of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Sustainability 2021, 13, 7409. [CrossRef] 59. Milligan, G.W. Cluster Analysis; College of Business, Ohio State University: Columbus, OH, USA, 1995. 60. Uprichard, E.; Byrne, D.S. Cluster Analysis. In Logic and Classics; SAGE: London, UK, 2012. 61. Everitt, B.S.; Landau, S.; Morven, L.; Stahl, D. Cluster Analysis, 5th ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011. 62. Derlukiewicz, N.; Mempel-Śnieżyk, A.; Mankowska, D.; Dyjakon, A.; Minta, S.; Pilawka, T. How do Clusters Foster Sustainable Development? An Analysis of EU Policies. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1297. [CrossRef] 63. Dillon, W.R.; Goldstein, M. Multivariate Analysis: Methods and Applications; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1984. 64. Dunteman, G.H. Principal Component Analysis; Sage: Newbury Park, CA, USA, 1989. 65. Jolliffe, I.T. Principal Component Analysis; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2010. 66. Jolliffe, I.T.; Cadima, J. Principal component analysis: A review and recent developments. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2016, 374. [CrossRef] 67. O’Rourke, N.; Hatcher, L. A Step-by-Step Approach to Using SAS for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling, 2nd ed.; SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC, USA, 2013. 68. Santos, R.D.O.; Gorgulho, B.M.; Castro, M.A.D.; Fisberg, R.M.; Marchioni, D.M.; Baltar, V.T. Principal component analysis and factor analysis: Differences and similarities in nutritional epidemiology application. Rev. Bras. Epidemiol. 2019, 22, e190041 [CrossRef] [PubMed] 69. Trojanowska, M.; N ˛ecka, K. Selection of the Multiple-Criiater Decision-Making Method for Evaluation of Sustainable Energy Development: A Case Study of Poland. Energies 2020, 13, 6321. [CrossRef] 70. Kryk, B.; Guzowska, M.K. Implementation of Climate/Energy Targets of the Europe 2020 Strategy by the EU Member States. Energies 2021, 14, 2711. [CrossRef] 71. Tutak, M.; Brodny, J.; Bindzár, P. Assessing the Level of Energy and Climate Sustainability in the European Union Countries in the Context of the European Green Deal Strategy and Agenda 2030. Energies 2021, 14, 1767. [CrossRef] 72. Ward, J.H. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1963, 58, 236–244. [CrossRef] 73. Martinho, V.J.P.D. Impact of covid-19 on the convergence of GDP per capita in OECD countries. Reg. Sci. Policy Pract. 2021. [CrossRef] 74. Green Economy. Available online: https://www.unep.org/regions/asia-and-pacific/regional-initiatives/supporting-resourceefficiency/green-economy (accessed on 10 August 2021). | |
utb.fulltext.sponsorship | The research was supported by the Research and Development Agency GA AA under the contract No. 21/2020: “Management, business risk and the firm bankruptcy in the segment of SMEs”. | |
utb.wos.affiliation | [Gavurova, Beata] Tomas Bata Univ Zlin, Fac Econ & Management, Ctr Appl Econ Res, Zlin 76001, Czech Republic; [Megyesiova, Silvia; Hudak, Matej] Univ Econ Bratislava, Fac Business Econ, Kosice 04130, Slovakia | |
utb.scopus.affiliation | Center for Applied Economic Research, Faculty of Management and Economics, Tomas Bata University in Zlín, Zlín, 760 01, Czech Republic; Faculty of Business Economy, University of Economics in Bratislava, Košice, 041 30, Slovakia | |
utb.fulltext.projects | 21/2020 | |
utb.fulltext.faculty | Faculty of Management and Economics | |
utb.fulltext.ou | Centre for Applied Economic Research | |
utb.identifier.jel | - |