Kontaktujte nás | Jazyk: čeština English
Název: | Biogenic amines and hygienic quality of lucerne silage | ||||||||||
Autor: | Mlejnková, Veronika; Horký, Pavel; Komínková, Markéta; Skládanka, Jiří; Hodulíková, Lucia; Adam, Vojtěch; Mlček, Jiří; Juríková, Tünde; Sochor, Jiří | ||||||||||
Typ dokumentu: | Recenzovaný odborný článek (English) | ||||||||||
Zdrojový dok.: | Open Life Sciences. 2016, vol. 11, issue 1, p. 280-286 | ||||||||||
ISSN: | 2391-5412 (Sherpa/RoMEO, JCR) | ||||||||||
Journal Impact
This chart shows the development of journal-level impact metrics in time
|
|||||||||||
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1515/biol-2016-0037 | ||||||||||
Abstrakt: | This experiment examined the influence of two different silage additives of biological (Lactococcus lactis, Lactobacillus plantarum, Enterococcus faecium, enzyme xylanase) and chemical (43% formic acid, 30% ammonium formate, 10% propionic acid, 2% benzoic acid) types on biogenic amines concentration, nutrient content, fermentation process, and microbiologic indicators in lucerne (Medicago sativa) silage after 90 days of fermentation. The biological additive significantly (P < 0.05) increased putrescine (+51%), lactic acid (+11%) and protein content (+11%) in comparison with control silage. It significantly decreased cadaverine (-29%), histamine (-57%), spermidine (-15%), spermine (-55%), acetic acid (-40%), ethanol (-55%), ammonium (-25%) and ash (-9%). After the chemical-additive treatment, greater amounts of histamine and tyramine were recorded. Significant decrease was observed in the concentrations of putrescine (-18%), cadaverine (-55%), spermidine (-47%), spermine (-45%), lactic acid (-16%), acetic acid (-46%), ammonium (-59%), ash (-13%) and fat (-24%). Populations of bacteria associated with lactic acid fermentation, moulds, yeasts, enterobacteria and total microorganisms count were also influenced. Both biological and chemical additives can be highly recommended for producing high-quality silages meeting hygienic requirements. In lucerne silage, the chemical preservative showed a stronger effect in achieving the health safety of silage compared to the biological inoculant. © 2016 Veronika Mlejnkova et al. | ||||||||||
Plný text: | https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/biol.2016.11.issue-1/biol-2016-0037/biol-2016-0037.xml | ||||||||||
Zobrazit celý záznam |