Publikace UTB
Repozitář publikační činnosti UTB

Utilization of multidimensional methods for corporate sustainability

Repozitář DSpace/Manakin

Zobrazit minimální záznam


dc.title Utilization of multidimensional methods for corporate sustainability en
dc.contributor.author Kocmanová, Alena
dc.contributor.author Pavláková Dočekalová, Marie
dc.contributor.author Němeček, Petr
dc.relation.ispartof WMSCI 2015 - 19th World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, Proceedings
dc.identifier.isbn 978-194176329-2
dc.date.issued 2015
utb.relation.volume 1
dc.citation.spage 69
dc.citation.epage 75
dc.event.title 19th World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, WMSCI 2015
dc.event.location Orlando, FL
utb.event.state-en United States
utb.event.state-cs Spojené státy americké
dc.event.sdate 2015-07-12
dc.event.edate 2015-07-15
dc.type conferenceObject
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher International Institute of Informatics and Systemics, IIIS
dc.relation.uri http://www.iiis.org/CDs2015/CD2015SCI/SCI_2015/PapersPdf/SA951QB.pdf
dc.subject Financial and non-financial indicators en
dc.subject Multivariate methods en
dc.subject Performance en
dc.subject Predictive models en
dc.subject Sustainable corporate performance index en
dc.description.abstract The article is focused on the use of multivariate methods for creating the Corporate Sustainability Index (CSI) predictive model for measuring sustainability of industrial companies according to CZ-NACE, and on comparing these methods. The goal of this article is to propose a suitable CSI predictive model and to determine which financial and non-financial indicators can most influence a company tending to sustainability. To determine the CSILA predictive model, the Logistic Regression is used, and to determine the CSIMDA model, the method of Multiple Discriminant Analysis. However, based on the theoretical analysis of each method it is necessary to state that the methods cannot be unequivocally compared, even though each of these methods identified similar significant financial and non-financial indicators, coefficients and tests, which are interpreted analogically in the methods and are created in different ways. The results of the comparison of the methods for determining the predictive model CSI show that the logistic regression seems to be the best, which has a high percentage of correctly classified companies based on the calculated probability; in this case, the Gini index is also highest. The resulting classification of companies into different groups in comparing these two methods underwent significant changes as opposed to the classification of the companies according to the Data Envelopment Analysis method. The conclusions of the research of measuring the sustainability of the company show that currently-in addition to financial indicators-also non-financial indicators must be included in predictive models, namely the environmental indicator, the social indicator and the corporate governance indicator. It means that for the companies it has become a necessity to build a unified system for measuring sustainability of a company; this requirement has been confirmed also by managers of companies. en
utb.faculty Faculty of Management and Economics
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10563/1006456
utb.identifier.obdid 43875190
utb.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-84961163609
utb.source d-scopus
dc.date.accessioned 2016-07-26T14:58:34Z
dc.date.available 2016-07-26T14:58:34Z
utb.contributor.internalauthor Němeček, Petr
utb.fulltext.affiliation Alena KOCMANOVA, Marie PAVLAKOVA DOCEKALOVA Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Business and Management, Department of Economics, Brno, Czech Republic and Petr NEMECEK Tomas Bata University in Zlín, Faculty of Management and Economics, Department of Management, Zlín, Czech Republic
utb.fulltext.dates -
utb.fulltext.references [1] G. H. Brundtland. “Our Common Future”, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987. [2] OECD. “Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators. Methodology and User Guide”, 2008.. [3] P. Mederly, J. Topercer, P. Nováček, P. “Indikátory kvality života a udržitelného rozvoje – kvantitativní, vicerozměrný a variantní přístup”, Praha: Univerzita Karlova, CESES, 2004. [4] M. Sajeva, D. Gatelli, S. Tarantola, H. Hollanders. “Metodology Report on European Innovation Scoreboard 2005”, European Commission, Enterprise Directorate-General, 2005. [5] E. I. Altman. Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis and the Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy. The Journal of Finance, Vol. 23, No. 4, 1968, pp.589–609. [6] J. R. Taffler, “Forecasting Company Failure in the UK Using Discriminant Analysis and Financial Ratio Data”. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Vol. 145, No. 3, 1982. [7] I. Neumaierová, I. Neumaier. “Index IN05”. In Evropské finanční systémy, Brno, Česká republika: Masarykova univerzita, 2005, pp.143–148. [8] A. Bhimani, M.A. Gulamhussen, S.D. Lopes. (2010) “Accounting and non-accounting determinants of default: an analysis of privately-held firms“, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 29 (6). 2010, pp.517-532. [9] R. S. Kaplan, D. Norton. “The Strategy Focussed Organisation”, HBS Press, USA, 2000. [10] K. Keasey, R. Watson. „Financial distress models: a review of their usefulness“, British journal of Management, 1991, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 89–102. [11] E. Eisenbeis. „Pitfalls in the application of discriminant analysis in business“. Journal of Finance, 1977, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 875–900. [12] S. Mcleay, A. Omar. „The sensitivity of prediction models to the non-normality of bounded an unbounded fi nancial ratios“, British Accounting Review, 2000, Vol. 32, pp. 213–230. [13] J. A. Ohlson. “Financial Ratios and the Probabilistic Prediction of Bankruptcy”, Journal of Accounting Research, 1980, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 109–131. [14] S. Balcaen, H. Ooghe. “35 years of studies on business failure: an overview of the classic statistical methodologies and their related problems”, The British Accounting Review, 2006, Vol. 38, pp. 63–93. [15] M. E. Zmijewski.”Methodological Issues Related to tne Estimation of Financial Distress Prediction Models”, Journal of Accounting Research, 1984, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 59–82. [16] D. Dluhošová, Z. Zmeškal. “Z-Metrics metodology and Altman rating models evolution”, In 8th International scientific conference Financial management of firms and financial institutions, 2011, pp. 1-11. [17] D. W. Hosmer, S. Lemeshow. „Applied Logistic Regression“, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, 2000, pp. 383. [18] S. W. Menard. „Applied Logistic Regression Analysis“. SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, 2001, pp. 110. [19] R. A. Fischer. "The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems." Annals of Eugenics, Vol. 7, pp. 179–188. [20] A. Field. “Discovery Statistic Using SPSS”. SAGE Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, 2009, p. 856. [21] A. Kocmanová, I. Šimberová. “Determination of environmental, social and corporate governance indicators: framework in the measurement of sustainable performance”, Journal of Business Economics and Management, 2014, Vol. 15, No. 5, pp. 1017–1033. [22] A. Kocmanová, M. Pavláková Dočekalová, P. Němeček. „Sustainable Corporate Performance Index for Manufacturing Industry“, In The 18th World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatic, 2014. pp. 1-6. [23] E. Cardinaels, P. M. G. van Veen-Dirks. “Financial versus non-financial information: The impact of information organization and presentation in a Balanced Scorecard”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 2010, Vol. 35, pp. 565–578.
utb.fulltext.sponsorship This paper is supported by the Czech Science Foundation. Name of the Project: Measuring Corporate Sustainability in Selected Sectors. Registration No. 14-23079S.
Find Full text

Soubory tohoto záznamu

Zobrazit minimální záznam