Publikace UTB
Repozitář publikační činnosti UTB

Adaptive control of twin rotor MIMO system: Polynomial approach

Repozitář DSpace/Manakin

Zobrazit minimální záznam


dc.title Adaptive control of twin rotor MIMO system: Polynomial approach en
dc.contributor.author Kubalčík, Marek
dc.contributor.author Bobál, Vladimír
dc.contributor.author Chalupa, Petr
dc.relation.ispartof IFAC Proceedings Volumes (IFAC-PapersOnline)
dc.identifier.issn 1474-6670 Scopus Sources, Sherpa/RoMEO, JCR
dc.identifier.isbn 0-08-045108-X
dc.identifier.isbn 978-0-08-045108-4
dc.date.issued 2005
utb.relation.volume 16
dc.citation.spage 892
dc.citation.epage 897
dc.event.title 16th Triennial World Congress of International Federation of Automatic Control, IFAC 2005
dc.event.location Prague
utb.event.state-en Czech Republic
utb.event.state-cs Česká republika
dc.event.sdate 2005-07-03
dc.event.edate 2005-07-08
dc.type conferenceObject
dc.language.iso en
dc.subject Decentralized control en
dc.subject Multivariable control en
dc.subject Nonlinear system en
dc.subject Polynomial methods en
dc.subject Real-time control en
dc.subject Self-tuning control en
dc.description.abstract This paper presents real - time control of the Twin Rotor MIMO System laboratory model. The objective laboratory model is a multivariable nonlinear unstable system of high order. It is not possible to stabilize the system and satisfactorily track reference signals using classical controllers with fixedly set parameters. Two methods based on self - tuning control utilizing adaptive approach are discussed. Both designed methods are based on polynomial approach. in first case an algorithm taking into account internal interactions among input and output variables was used. The second method utilizes the principle of decentralized control with an additional logical supervisor for switching of the recursive identification in particular loops. in both cases stability of closed loop system was ensured and after an adaptation phase the asymptotic tracking of reference signals was achieved. Quality of control achieved by particular methods is compared and discussed. Copyright © 2005 IFAC. en
utb.faculty Faculty of Technology
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10563/1005026
utb.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-79960704075
utb.source d-scopus
dc.date.accessioned 2015-06-04T12:56:47Z
dc.date.available 2015-06-04T12:56:47Z
utb.contributor.internalauthor Kubalčík, Marek
utb.contributor.internalauthor Bobál, Vladimír
utb.contributor.internalauthor Chalupa, Petr
Find Full text

Soubory tohoto záznamu

Zobrazit minimální záznam