Publikace UTB
Repozitář publikační činnosti UTB

New Generation of the University's Strategy Formulation Processes to Achieve a Competitive Advantage in Egypt

Repozitář DSpace/Manakin

Zobrazit minimální záznam


dc.title New Generation of the University's Strategy Formulation Processes to Achieve a Competitive Advantage in Egypt en
dc.contributor.author Hassanin, Mahmoud Elsayed Moustafa
dc.relation.ispartof Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Vol 1 and 2
dc.identifier.isbn 978-1-908272-14-0
dc.date.issued 2011
dc.citation.spage 436
dc.citation.epage 445
dc.event.title 6th European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship (ECIE)
dc.event.location Aberdeen
utb.event.state-en Scotland
utb.event.state-cs Skotsko
dc.event.sdate 2011-09-15
dc.event.edate 2011-09-16
dc.type conferenceObject
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher Academic Conferences and Publishing International (ACPI) en
dc.relation.uri https://books.google.cz/books?id=BTldtLaLRHgC&pg=PA436
dc.subject Strategy en
dc.subject Strategy formulation process en
dc.subject Competitive advantage en
dc.subject Activity map en
dc.description.abstract Globalization, knowledge revolution and networking are the driving forces of the Knowledge-based economy. In knowledge-based economy, capturing and leveraging the value of Intellectual Property (IP) is generally held to be the path to sustainable wealth creation and societal benefits. Economic prosperity depends heavily on exploiting innovation capacity, improving competitiveness, and enhancing productivity. University is the main source for developing future creative entrepreneurs and it engages with other sectors in research and knowledge transfer. Commercialization of the university's innovation is essential for creating added value for the university, the surrounding region and the whole society. The role of university has been enlarged to include not only teaching and researching but also regional development under the name of entrepreneurial university. In current dynamic era, universities are facing many challenges such as: internationalization and massive competition. Meanwhile, most of applied strategies in the university have failed in the talking-doing gap. A top-down approach that starts with vision/mission statements is an obvious meaning of statements substitute actions. A new generation of strategic formulation processes that mitigates the gap should be identified. This research provides a new formulation process that is called (ABDSD). It is based on action not a description of action. The qualitative methodology has been used meanly a combination of tools such as: (1) Documentation and (2) Case-studies. Two universities have been chosen as an example of how to analyze and to benchmark their activities. Then, eight universities have chosen for applying and validating this methodology. The feedback from the eight universities was highly positive. This dynamic approach mitigates the implementation problems and allows the university to change its strategy successfully to gain a competitive advantage. The research consists of a literature review, strategy formulation processes, drawing a profile for each university's competitive advantages, and finally it provides recommendations that enhance the strategy of the university. en
utb.faculty Faculty of Management and Economics
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10563/1003053
utb.identifier.obdid 43866505
utb.identifier.wok 000310338800054
utb.source d-wok
dc.date.accessioned 2012-12-18T08:35:37Z
dc.date.available 2012-12-18T08:35:37Z
utb.contributor.internalauthor Hassanin, Mahmoud Elsayed Moustafa
utb.fulltext.affiliation Mahmoud Hassanin Tomas Bata University, in Zlín, Czech Republic hassanien@fame.utb.cz Mahmoud Hassanin Phd Candidate Tomas Bata University Faculty of Management and Economics Assistant Teacher in Pharos University Alexandria – Egypt Ma.hassanen@gmail.com hassanien@fame.utb.cz +420776056189
utb.fulltext.dates -
utb.fulltext.references Dill, D. (1996)”Academic Planning and Organizational Design: Lessons from Leading American Universities”, Higher Education Quarterly 50, pp 35-53. Elbaradei, M. (2009) “Access, Equality and Competitiveness: the Case of Higher Education in Egypt”, Paper read at conference” Arab Regional Conference on Higher Education, [Online], www: <http://www.unesco.org/en/higher-education/dynamic-content-singleview/news/regional_conference_on_higher_education_urges_arab_states_to_innovate/back/11995/cHash/b67016f9a3/ > Etzkowitz, H. (2003) “Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: the invention of the entrepreneurial university”, Elsevier: Research Policy (32). pp 109-121. Gibb, A. (2009) “Leading the Entrepreneurial University: Meeting the entrepreneurial development needs of higher education institutions”, The National Council for Graduate Entrepreneurship: Said Business School, University of Oxford, UK, pp1- 41. Hardy, C., Langley A., Mintzberg H., and Rose J. (1984) “Strategy Formation in the University Setting,” In Bess, James L. (ed.) College and University Organization: Insights from the Behavioral Sciences. New York/London: New York University Press, pp169–210. Keller, G. (1983) Academic Strategy: The Management Revolution in American Higher Education, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. Kim, W.C. and Mauborgne, R. (1997) Value innovation: the strategic logic of high growth, Harvard Business Review, (January–February) pp.103–112. Kim, W.C. and Mauborgne, R. (1998) Creating new market space, Harvard Business Review, pp 83–93 Larsen, I; Langfeldt, L. (2005) “Profiling Comprehensiveness Strategy Formulation and Effects of Strategies Programmes at Traditional Universities: Reform and Change in Higher Education”, Springer: Printed in the Netherlands. PP 343-362. Maassen, P. and Vanvught F. (1992) “Strategic Planning” In Clark, Burton and Guy Neave (eds). The Encyclopedia of Higher Education, vol. 2, Analytical Perspectives, Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1483-1494. Mason, J. (2002) Qualitative Researching, London: Sage Publication. Morgan, M.; Levitt and R.; Malek, W. (2007) Executing your Strategy: How to break it down & Get it done, USA: Harvard Business School Press. Musselin, C. and Mignot-Gerard, S, (2002) “The Recent Evolution of French Universities” In Amara, A., G. Jones and B. Karseth (Eds), Governing Higher Education: National Perspectives on Institutional Governance, pp 63–85. Pfeffer, J. and Sutton, R. (1999) the Knowing-Doing Gap: How Smart Companies Turn Knowledge into Action, Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press, 256 s, ISBN: 1578511240. Porter, M. (1996) what is strategy? USA: Harvard Business School Press, P. 61-78. Porter, M. (1998) Competitive Advantage, New York: The Free Press Rinne, R. and Koivula, J. (2009) The Dilemmas of the changing university, Chapter 10 in Shattock Yin, R. (1994).Case Study Research: Design and Methods, London: Sage. Yin, R. (2002) Case study research, London: Sage pubns, ISBN 13:9780761925538. Zeleny, M., Kasanen, E. and Östermark, R. (1991) “Gestalt system of holistic graphics: new management support view of MCDM”, Computers and Operations Research, Vol. 18, pp 233–239. Zeleny, M. (2005)”The Innovation Factory: Production of Value-Added Quality and Innovation” [Online] New York, [cit. Feb 12, 2011]. Available from WWW: <http://www.milanzeleny.com/documents/publications/e+m.pdf>. Zeleny, M. (2008) “Strategy and Action in the global era: Overcoming the Knowing-Doing Gap”, Int. J. Technology Management Vol. 43, No1/2/3, pp 64-75. Zeleny, M. (2010).Strategy as Action: from Porter to Anti-Porter. Int. J. Strategic Decision Sciences, Vol. 1, No.1, pp 1 to 11.
utb.fulltext.sponsorship -
utb.fulltext.projects -
utb.fulltext.faculty -
utb.fulltext.ou -
utb.identifier.jel -
Find Full text

Soubory tohoto záznamu

Zobrazit minimální záznam